Philippe Gédet
Impact in
- Oral Surgery top 5%
- Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes
- Orthodontics top 10%
- Dental materials and restorations
Papers in
- Surgery 7
- Spinal Fractures and Fixation Techniques 3
- Scoliosis diagnosis and treatment 2
-
- Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology 6
- Co-authors
- Stephen J. Ferguson (8 shared papers)Daniel Haschtmann (5 shared papers)Jivko Stoyanov (1 shared paper)Thomas Hefti (1 shared paper)Falko Schlottig (1 shared paper)Henning Schliephake (1 shared paper)Philippe Büchler (3 shared papers)Wock Hallermann (2 shared papers)
- Journals
- European Spine Journal (2 papers)Computer Aided Surgery (2 papers)Veterinary Surgery (2 papers)BMC Veterinary Research (1 paper)Injury (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- SwitzerlandGermanyDominican Republic
In The Last Decade
Philippe Gédet
15 papers receiving 360 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 43
- Oral Surgery 93
- Orthodontics 38
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine 137
- Small Animals 40
- Surgery 117
Countries citing papers authored by Philippe Gédet
This map shows the geographic impact of Philippe Gédet's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Philippe Gédet with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Philippe Gédet more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Philippe Gédet
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Philippe Gédet. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Philippe Gédet. The network helps show where Philippe Gédet may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Philippe Gédet, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2007 | 88 | |
| 2 | 2010 | 72 | |
| 3 | 2006 | 35 | |
| 4 | 2009 | 34 | |
| 5 | Quantifying the influence of bone density and thickness on resonance frequency analysis: an in vitro study of biomechanical test materials. | 2010 | 34 |
| 6 | 2012 | 25 | |
| 7 | 2008 | 19 | |
| 8 | 2012 | 15 | |
| 9 | 2008 | 13 | |
| 10 | 2009 | 11 | |
| 11 | 2010 | 10 | |
| 12 | 2009 | 10 | |
| 13 | 2007 | 5 | |
| 14 | 2010 | 5 | |
| 15 | 2007 | 1 |
About Philippe Gédet
Philippe Gédet is a scholar working on Surgery, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Epidemiology, Oral Surgery and Small Animals, having authored 15 papers that have together received 377 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology (6 papers), Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes (3 papers), Bone fractures and treatments (3 papers), Spinal Fractures and Fixation Techniques (3 papers), Veterinary Orthopedics and Neurology (2 papers), Scoliosis diagnosis and treatment (2 papers), Medical Imaging and Analysis (2 papers) and Sarcoma Diagnosis and Treatment (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Oral Surgery (93 citations), Orthodontics (38 citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (137 citations), Small Animals (40 citations) and Surgery (117 citations). Philippe Gédet has collaborated with scholars based in Switzerland, Germany and Dominican Republic. Frequent co-authors include Stephen J. Ferguson, Daniel Haschtmann, Jivko Stoyanov, Thomas Hefti, Falko Schlottig, Henning Schliephake, Philippe Büchler, Wock Hallermann, Franck Forterre and Marcus G. Doherr. Their work appears in journals such as European Spine Journal, Computer Aided Surgery, Veterinary Surgery, BMC Veterinary Research and Injury.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.