Computer Aided Surgery

About

The 936 papers published in Computer Aided Surgery in the last decades have received a total of 19.9k indexed citations. Papers published in Computer Aided Surgery usually cover Surgery (536 papers), Biomedical Engineering (323 papers) and Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (194 papers) specifically the topics of Surgical Simulation and Training (165 papers), Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty (140 papers) and Total Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes (136 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Computer Aided Surgery are Kevin Cleary, Charles C. Nguyen, M. Sati, Cyril Boéri, Jean–Yves Jenny, John R. Adler, Martin J. Murphy, Mohan Bodduluri, Achim Schweikard and Jocelyne Troccaz.

In The Last Decade

Computer Aided Surgery

903 papers receiving 19.2k citations

Fields of papers published in Computer Aided Surgery

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Computer Aided Surgery. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Computer Aided Surgery.

Countries where authors publish in Computer Aided Surgery

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Computer Aided Surgery. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Computer Aided Surgery with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Computer Aided Surgery more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026