Computer Aided Surgery

23.9k citations
959 papers · · active since 1950

Impact in

  • Surgery top 5%
    • Surgical Simulation and Training
    • Total Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes
    • Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty
    • Spinal Fractures and Fixation Techniques
  • Radiation top 5%

Papers in

    • Surgical Simulation and Training 146
    • Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty 122
    • Total Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes 119
    • Spinal Fractures and Fixation Techniques 79
    • Augmented Reality Applications 87
    • Medical Image Segmentation Techniques 63

Computer Aided Surgery

836 papers receiving 19.7k citations

Peers

Computer Aided Surgery
Comparison fields: 5 of 180
  • Surgery 11.4k
  • Radiation 1.5k
  • Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 3.7k
  • Biomedical Engineering 7.3k
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 2.9k
Replace International Journal for Numerical Methods in Biomedical Engineering with:
International Journal for Numerical Methods in Biomedical Engineering United States
Nature Biomedical Engineering United States
Journal of Medical Imaging United States
Journal of Medical and Biological Engineering Taiwan
Journal of X-Ray Science and Technology China
Seminars in Ultrasound CT and MRI United States
Ultrasonic Imaging United States
Tissue Engineering Part C Methods United States
Anatomical Sciences Education United States
Journal Of Big Data United States
Computer Aided Surgery relative to International Journal for Numerical Methods in Biomedical Engineering United States International Journal for Numerical Methods in Biomedical Engineering's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×15×20×23.6×
International Journal for Numerical Methods in Biomedical Engineering · 1×
Citations per year

Countries where authors publish in Computer Aided Surgery

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Computer Aided Surgery. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Computer Aided Surgery with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Computer Aided Surgery more than expected).

Fields of papers published in Computer Aided Surgery

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Computer Aided Surgery. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Computer Aided Surgery.

About Computer Aided Surgery

The 959 papers published in Computer Aided Surgery in the last decades have received a total of 23.9k indexed citations . Papers published in Computer Aided Surgery usually cover Surgery (480 papers), Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (167 papers), Radiation (60 papers), Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design (24 papers) and Biomedical Engineering (276 papers) specifically the topics of Surgical Simulation and Training (146 papers), Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty (122 papers), Total Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes (119 papers), Anatomy and Medical Technology (104 papers), Soft Robotics and Applications (103 papers), Augmented Reality Applications (87 papers), Spinal Fractures and Fixation Techniques (79 papers) and Medical Image Segmentation Techniques (63 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Computer Aided Surgery are Kevin Cleary, Charles C. Nguyen, M. Sati, John R. Adler, Martin J. Murphy, Mohan Bodduluri, Jean–Yves Jenny, Cyril Boéri, Achim Schweikard and Jocelyne Troccaz.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact