Philip Yip
Impact in
- Instrumentation top 10%
- Advanced Optical Sensing Technologies
- Biophysics top 5%
- Advanced Fluorescence Microscopy Techniques
Papers in
-
- Advanced Fluorescence Microscopy Techniques 4
-
- Analytical Chemistry and Chromatography 2
- Mass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications 1
- Co-authors
- David James Stuart Birch (8 shared papers)Clement C.Y. Ip (1 shared paper)Lee L. Bernardis (1 shared paper)Marina K. Kuimova (1 shared paper)Gökhan Yahioglu (1 shared paper)Jana Humpolíčková (1 shared paper)Oscar Ces (1 shared paper)Martin Hof (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Measurement Science and Technology (2 papers)Chemical Science (1 paper)Methods and Applications in Fluorescence (1 paper)The Analyst (1 paper)Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomDenmarkGermany
In The Last Decade
Philip Yip
13 papers receiving 430 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 85
- Instrumentation 113
- Biophysics 94
- Acoustics and Ultrasonics 8
- Spectroscopy 74
- Bioengineering 22
Countries citing papers authored by Philip Yip
This map shows the geographic impact of Philip Yip's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Philip Yip with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Philip Yip more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Philip Yip
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Philip Yip. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Philip Yip. The network helps show where Philip Yip may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Philip Yip, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2013 | 169 | |
| 2 | 2019 | 111 | |
| 3 | Role of prolactin in the promotion of dimethylbenz[a]anthracene-induced mammary tumors by dietary fat. | 1980 | 53 |
| 4 | 2021 | 43 | |
| 5 | 2018 | 28 | |
| 6 | 2014 | 15 | |
| 7 | 2016 | 8 | |
| 8 | 2012 | 6 | |
| 9 | 2013 | 6 | |
| 10 | 2020 | 5 | |
| 11 | 2017 | 4 | |
| 12 | 2019 | 4 | |
| 13 | 1977 | 2 |
About Philip Yip
Philip Yip is a scholar working on Biophysics, Spectroscopy, Instrumentation, Physical and Theoretical Chemistry and Nutrition and Dietetics, having authored 13 papers that have together received 454 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Advanced Fluorescence Microscopy Techniques (4 papers), Biochemical Analysis and Sensing Techniques (2 papers), Analytical Chemistry and Chromatography (2 papers), melanin and skin pigmentation (2 papers), Advanced Optical Sensing Technologies (2 papers), Lipid Membrane Structure and Behavior (1 paper), Radical Photochemical Reactions (1 paper) and Mass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Instrumentation (113 citations), Biophysics (94 citations), Acoustics and Ultrasonics (8 citations), Spectroscopy (74 citations) and Bioengineering (22 citations). Philip Yip has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Denmark and Germany. Frequent co-authors include David James Stuart Birch, Clement C.Y. Ip, Lee L. Bernardis, Marina K. Kuimova, Gökhan Yahioglu, Jana Humpolíčková, Oscar Ces, Martin Hof, Yilei Wu and Duncan Casey. Their work appears in journals such as Measurement Science and Technology, Chemical Science, Methods and Applications in Fluorescence, The Analyst and Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.