Philip Warelow

25 papers receiving 787 citations

Peers

Philip Warelow
Comparison fields: 5 of 85
  • Research and Theory 89
  • Radiological and Ultrasound Technology 130
  • Issues, ethics and legal aspects 31
  • General Health Professions 349
  • Clinical Psychology 285
Replace Annette Huntington with:
Annette Huntington New Zealand
Sara Horton‐Deutsch United States
Stephen Tee United Kingdom
Karen Ford Australia
Hsiang‐Chu Pai Taiwan
John Fowler United States
Michal Itzhaki Israel
Rita Schreiber Canada
Gweneth Hartrick Doane Canada
Anne J. Davis United States
Philip Warelow relative to Annette Huntington New Zealand Annette Huntington's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.8×
Annette Huntington · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Philip Warelow

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Philip Warelow's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Philip Warelow with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Philip Warelow more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Philip Warelow

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Philip Warelow. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Philip Warelow. The network helps show where Philip Warelow may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 13 scholars most cited alongside Philip Warelow, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Philip Warelow Line = papers co-authored together Philip Warelow links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 25 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2014209
2 2015129
3 200588
4 200755
5 200950
6 200828
7 200028
8 199627
9 201526
10 200926
11 199726
12 199924
13
Simulation to Practice: Developing Nursing Skills in Mental Health: An Australian Perspective
200718
14 199617
15 200017
16 199716
17 199913
18 201310
19 20117
20 20027

About Philip Warelow

Philip Warelow is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Clinical Psychology, Research and Theory, Education and Radiological and Ultrasound Technology, having authored 25 papers that have together received 841 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Interprofessional Education and Collaboration (6 papers), Nursing education and management (6 papers), Social Work Education and Practice (3 papers), Mental Health and Psychiatry (2 papers), Workplace Violence and Bullying (2 papers), Ethics in medical practice (2 papers), Social Science and Policy Research (2 papers) and Family and Patient Care in Intensive Care Units (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Research and Theory (89 citations), Radiological and Ultrasound Technology (130 citations), Issues, ethics and legal aspects (31 citations), General Health Professions (349 citations) and Clinical Psychology (285 citations). Philip Warelow has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Karen‐Leigh Edward, Karen Ousey, Steve Lui, Colin Holmes, John Stephenson, Jo‐Ann Giandinoto, Samantha Wells, Wendy Penney, Ian Munro and Anthony Welch. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Advanced Nursing, Contemporary Nurse, International Journal of Mental Health Nursing, Nursing Inquiry and International Journal of Nursing Practice.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact