Philip Roe

10 papers receiving 423 citations

Peers

Philip Roe
Comparison fields: 5 of 100
  • Family Practice 35
  • Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty 28
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 87
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 39
  • General Health Professions 66
Replace Nazi Torabi with:
Nazi Torabi Canada
Benjamin Chin‐Yee Canada
S. Beth Bierer United States
Feinstein Ar United States
Eve Purdy Australia
Mike D Cadogan Australia
Philip J Kroth United States
Allan Korn United States
Tisha M. Felder United States
Gary P. Barnas United States
Philip Roe relative to Nazi Torabi Canada Nazi Torabi's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Nazi Torabi · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Philip Roe

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Philip Roe's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Philip Roe with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Philip Roe more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Philip Roe

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Philip Roe. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Philip Roe. The network helps show where Philip Roe may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Philip Roe, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Philip Roe Line = papers co-authored together Philip Roe links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

13 of 13 papers shown
#Work
1 2016178
2 1978142
3 200847
4 201224
5 201115
6 201613
7 20157
8 20136
9 20234
10 20184
11
Basic skills capacity in Wales: provider and learner perceptions
20081
12 20090
13 20090

About Philip Roe

Philip Roe is a scholar working on Oncology, Sociology and Political Science, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Economics and Econometrics and Education, having authored 13 papers that have together received 441 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Global Cancer Incidence and Screening (3 papers), Economic and Financial Impacts of Cancer (2 papers), Mental Health and Psychiatry (1 paper), Medical and Biological Sciences (1 paper), Nutrition, Genetics, and Disease (1 paper), Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills (1 paper), Health and Medical Research Impacts (1 paper) and Schizophrenia research and treatment (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Family Practice (35 citations), Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty (28 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (87 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (39 citations) and General Health Professions (66 citations). Philip Roe has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Malaysia and Belgium. Frequent co-authors include Grant Lewison, Richard Sullivan, Simon Jones, Clive E. Hyde, David P. Goldberg, Peter Maguire, Ajay Aggarwal, Matthew Peters, Edward L. Trimble and Carolyn Aldigé. Their work appears in journals such as Scientometrics, Psychological Medicine, Gerontology, European Journal of Cancer and Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact