Philip Ma
Impact in
- Organic Chemistry top 10%
- Asymmetric Synthesis and Catalysis
- Synthetic Organic Chemistry Methods
- Synthesis and Catalytic Reactions
- Carbohydrate Chemistry and Synthesis
- Chemical Synthesis and Reactions
-
- Asymmetric Hydrogenation and Catalysis
Papers in
-
- Asymmetric Synthesis and Catalysis 3
- Synthetic Organic Chemistry Methods 2
-
- Chemical Synthesis and Analysis 4
- Enzyme Catalysis and Immobilization 2
- Co-authors
- Satoru Masamune (4 shared papers)Pat N. Confalone (3 shared papers)John Wityak (3 shared papers)Biao Jiang (2 shared papers)Yukishige Ito (1 shared paper)Jiacheng Zhou (1 shared paper)John W. Ellingboe (1 shared paper)Hiroshi Okumoto (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- The Journal of Organic Chemistry (3 papers)Tetrahedron Letters (2 papers)Organic Process Research & Development (2 papers)Journal of Medicinal Chemistry (2 papers)Cancer Research (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesAustraliaCanada
In The Last Decade
Philip Ma
20 papers receiving 401 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 94
- Organic Chemistry 267
- Inorganic Chemistry 46
- Spectroscopy 44
- Biotechnology 22
- Molecular Biology 169
Countries citing papers authored by Philip Ma
This map shows the geographic impact of Philip Ma's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Philip Ma with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Philip Ma more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Philip Ma
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Philip Ma. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Philip Ma. The network helps show where Philip Ma may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Philip Ma, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1997 | 63 | |
| 2 | 1995 | 58 | |
| 3 | 1984 | 56 | |
| 4 | 2003 | 44 | |
| 5 | 2001 | 41 | |
| 6 | 1986 | 28 | |
| 7 | 2003 | 19 | |
| 8 | 2017 | 17 | |
| 9 | 1991 | 16 | |
| 10 | 1989 | 14 | |
| 11 | 2022 | 14 | |
| 12 | 1995 | 12 | |
| 13 | 1994 | 12 | |
| 14 | 1981 | 10 | |
| 15 | 2000 | 6 | |
| 16 | 1997 | 4 | |
| 17 | 2002 | 4 | |
| 18 | 1992 | 2 | |
| 19 | 2001 | 1 | |
| 20 | 2022 | 1 |
About Philip Ma
Philip Ma is a scholar working on Organic Chemistry, Molecular Biology, Spectroscopy, Oncology and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, having authored 20 papers that have together received 422 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Chemical Synthesis and Analysis (4 papers), Asymmetric Synthesis and Catalysis (3 papers), Monoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies Research (3 papers), Molecular spectroscopy and chirality (2 papers), Analytical Chemistry and Chromatography (2 papers), Enzyme Catalysis and Immobilization (2 papers), Synthetic Organic Chemistry Methods (2 papers) and Pancreatic function and diabetes (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Organic Chemistry (267 citations), Inorganic Chemistry (46 citations), Spectroscopy (44 citations), Biotechnology (22 citations) and Molecular Biology (169 citations). Philip Ma has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Australia and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Satoru Masamune, Pat N. Confalone, John Wityak, Biao Jiang, Yukishige Ito, Jiacheng Zhou, John W. Ellingboe, Hiroshi Okumoto, Carlos Jaime and Eiji Ōsawa. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Organic Chemistry, Tetrahedron Letters, Organic Process Research & Development, Journal of Medicinal Chemistry and Cancer Research.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.