Philip J. Ebert
Impact in
- Developmental Neuroscience top 2%
- Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms
- Biological Psychiatry top 5%
Papers in
-
- Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling 3
-
- Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research 4
- Co-authors
- Pat Levitt (11 shared papers)Károly Mirnics (10 shared papers)Antonio M. Persico (3 shared papers)Jerry L. Campbell (5 shared papers)Krassimira Garbett (6 shared papers)Amy W. Helms (2 shared papers)Thomas Hunsaker (2 shared papers)Jane E. Johnson (2 shared papers)
- Journals
- Cancer Research (5 papers)Clinical Cancer Research (4 papers)Molecular Psychiatry (3 papers)Oncotarget (2 papers)Biological Psychiatry (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesHungaryItaly
In The Last Decade
Philip J. Ebert
36 papers receiving 2.4k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 115
- Developmental Neuroscience 210
- Biological Psychiatry 78
- Cognitive Neuroscience 588
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 445
- Genetics 610
Countries citing papers authored by Philip J. Ebert
This map shows the geographic impact of Philip J. Ebert's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Philip J. Ebert with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Philip J. Ebert more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Philip J. Ebert
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Philip J. Ebert. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Philip J. Ebert. The network helps show where Philip J. Ebert may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Philip J. Ebert, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 36 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2006 | 337 | |
| 2 | 2008 | 313 | |
| 3 | 2001 | 258 | |
| 4 | 2006 | 210 | |
| 5 | 2007 | 168 | |
| 6 | 2019 | 160 | |
| 7 | 2007 | 110 | |
| 8 | 2009 | 90 | |
| 9 | 2003 | 84 | |
| 10 | 2006 | 80 | |
| 11 | 2010 | 67 | |
| 12 | 2014 | 66 | |
| 13 | 2018 | 62 | |
| 14 | 2007 | 57 | |
| 15 | 2018 | 49 | |
| 16 | 2019 | 46 | |
| 17 | 2017 | 40 | |
| 18 | 2018 | 38 | |
| 19 | 2013 | 31 | |
| 20 | 2023 | 25 |
About Philip J. Ebert
Philip J. Ebert is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Oncology, Genetics and Cancer Research, having authored 36 papers that have together received 2.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (4 papers), Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders (4 papers), Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics (4 papers), Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms (3 papers), Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling (3 papers), Colorectal Cancer Treatments and Studies (3 papers), Liver physiology and pathology (2 papers) and Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Developmental Neuroscience (210 citations), Biological Psychiatry (78 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (588 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (445 citations) and Genetics (610 citations). Philip J. Ebert has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Hungary and Italy. Frequent co-authors include Pat Levitt, Károly Mirnics, Antonio M. Persico, Jerry L. Campbell, Krassimira Garbett, Amy W. Helms, Thomas Hunsaker, Jane E. Johnson, Amanda Mitchell and Carla Lintas. Their work appears in journals such as Cancer Research, Clinical Cancer Research, Molecular Psychiatry, Oncotarget and Biological Psychiatry.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.