Philip Hunter

2.7k citations
210 papers · 2.0k · h-index 20

Impact in

Papers in

    • Nutrition, Genetics, and Disease 5
    • Forensic and Genetic Research 5
    • Information and Cyber Security 6
    • Research Data Management Practices 5

Philip Hunter

187 papers receiving 1.8k citations

Peers

Philip Hunter
Comparison fields: 5 of 205
  • Health 62
  • Health Informatics 10
  • Information Systems and Management 49
  • Molecular Biology 445
  • Genetics 178
Replace Carson Sievert with:
Carson Sievert United States
Eva Reischl Germany
Meredith Wadman United States
Govindasamy Agoramoorthy Taiwan
Tony Tse United States
Daniel Jacobson United States
Indra Neil Sarkar United States
Erika Check Hayden United States
Sara Reardon United States
Tianli Zheng China
Philip Hunter relative to Carson Sievert United States Carson Sievert's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3.3×
Carson Sievert · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Philip Hunter

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Philip Hunter's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Philip Hunter with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Philip Hunter more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Philip Hunter

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Philip Hunter. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Philip Hunter. The network helps show where Philip Hunter may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 20 scholars most cited alongside Philip Hunter, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Philip Hunter Line = papers co-authored together Philip Hunter links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 210 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2012261
2 2017149
3
The National Aboriginal Community Controlled Health Organisation
199898
4 200798
5 201857
6 200952
7 200851
8 201649
9 200249
10 201646
11 202043
12 200842
13 200840
14 201634
15 201727
16 201827
17 200924
18 201822
19 201620
20 201520

About Philip Hunter

Philip Hunter is a scholar working on Genetics, Information Systems, Molecular Biology, Ecology and Infectious Diseases, having authored 210 papers that have together received 2.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include CRISPR and Genetic Engineering (9 papers), Network Security and Intrusion Detection (9 papers), Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies (7 papers), Information and Cyber Security (6 papers), Research Data Management Practices (5 papers), Scientific Computing and Data Management (5 papers), Nutrition, Genetics, and Disease (5 papers) and Forensic and Genetic Research (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Health (62 citations), Health Informatics (10 citations), Information Systems and Management (49 citations), Molecular Biology (445 citations) and Genetics (178 citations). Philip Hunter has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Kirk Cameron, Marieke Guy, Michael J. Day, Bobby P. Smyth, Laura Cunha Rodrigues, Michelle Evans, Katherine Jackson, Louise H Letley, Greta Rait and Laura Viviani. Their work appears in journals such as EMBO Reports, Computer Fraud & Security, The Electronic Library, Local Government Studies and Aslib Journal of Information Management.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact