Michael Day

125 papers receiving 2.0k citations

Peers

Michael Day
Comparison fields: 5 of 148
  • Insect Science 630
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 502
  • Visual Arts and Performing Arts 107
  • Biochemistry 141
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 231
Replace Keiichi Honda with:
Keiichi Honda Japan
Nicolas Pichaud Canada
John M. Midgley United Kingdom
Adam B. Salmon United States
Samantha M. Solon‐Biet Australia
ELENA G. PASYUKOVA Russia
Wei Wen Guo China
Robert C. MacPhail United States
Bruce L. Welch United States
Janny L. Peters Netherlands
Michael Day relative to Keiichi Honda Japan Keiichi Honda's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×4×4.7×
Keiichi Honda · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Michael Day

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael Day's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael Day with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael Day more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael Day

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael Day. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael Day. The network helps show where Michael Day may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Michael Day, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Michael Day Line = papers co-authored together Michael Day links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 146 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
Lantana: Current Management Status and Future Prospects
2003196
2 2018165
3 1963128
4 1974104
5 200989
6 196288
7 196482
8 197362
9 196361
10 197559
11 200756
12
Tissue levels of several radiolabelled beta-adrenoceptor antagonists after intravenous administration in rats.
197955
13 197352
14 196149
15 197446
16 196242
17 198142
18 200039
19 200038
20 196835

About Michael Day

Michael Day is a scholar working on Insect Science, Visual Arts and Performing Arts, Plant Science, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience and Small Animals, having authored 146 papers that have together received 2.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Biological Control of Invasive Species (57 papers), Allelopathy and phytotoxic interactions (26 papers), Weed Control and Herbicide Applications (19 papers), Art Education and Development (18 papers), Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling (16 papers), Renin-Angiotensin System Studies (10 papers), Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (10 papers) and Veterinary Pharmacology and Anesthesia (10 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Insect Science (630 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (502 citations), Visual Arts and Performing Arts (107 citations), Biochemistry (141 citations) and Nature and Landscape Conservation (231 citations). Michael Day has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and United States. Frequent co-authors include Michael John Rand, Alan G. Roach, Myron Philip Zalucki, J. Playford, Chris Wiley, Rachel L. Winston, Hariet L. Hinz, Mark Schwarzländer, David Andrew Owen and Peter R. Warren. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmacology, Biological Control, Biocontrol Science and Technology, British Journal of Pharmacology and BioControl.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact