Philip Heiser

1.3k citations
45 papers · 982 · h-index 20

Impact in

Papers in

Philip Heiser

43 papers receiving 906 citations

Peers

Philip Heiser
Comparison fields: 5 of 93
  • Biological Psychiatry 88
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 460
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 56
  • Endocrine and Autonomic Systems 69
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 185
Replace Douglas G. Kondo with:
Douglas G. Kondo United States
Pascale Mazzola‐Pomietto France
Huaqing Meng China
Giuseppe Di Iorio Italy
Ertuğrul Eşel Türkiye
Jan Malte Bumb Germany
Igor Ondrejka Slovakia
HJ Möller Germany
Roland Ricken Germany
Cristian Zeni Brazil
Philip Heiser relative to Douglas G. Kondo United States Douglas G. Kondo's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Douglas G. Kondo · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Philip Heiser

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Philip Heiser's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Philip Heiser with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Philip Heiser more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Philip Heiser

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Philip Heiser. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Philip Heiser. The network helps show where Philip Heiser may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Philip Heiser, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Philip Heiser Line = papers co-authored together Philip Heiser links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 45 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2005104
2 200084
3 200560
4 200458
5 200649
6 200847
7 200644
8 200941
9 200838
10 200636
11 200728
12 200926
13 202025
14 200624
15 200823
16 200923
17 200421
18 201020
19 200520
20 201219

About Philip Heiser

Philip Heiser is a scholar working on Psychiatry and Mental health, Biological Psychiatry, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Behavioral Neuroscience and Clinical Psychology, having authored 45 papers that have together received 982 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (14 papers), Tryptophan and brain disorders (9 papers), Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (7 papers), Schizophrenia research and treatment (7 papers), Stress Responses and Cortisol (6 papers), Psychiatric care and mental health services (4 papers), Sleep and related disorders (4 papers) and Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Biological Psychiatry (88 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (460 citations), Behavioral Neuroscience (56 citations), Endocrine and Autonomic Systems (69 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (185 citations). Philip Heiser has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Switzerland and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Helmut Remschmidt, Helmut Vedder, Eberhard Schulz, Beate Herpertz‐Dahlmann, Jürgen-Christian Krieg, Andreas Warnke, Peter M. Wehmeier, Johannes Hebebrand, Susann Friedel and J.‐C. Krieg. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Neural Transmission, Frontiers in Psychiatry, Journal of Psychopharmacology, Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology and Biological Psychiatry and Journal of Psychiatric Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact