Philip Hefner

513 citations
62 papers · 240 · h-index 8

Impact in

Papers in

Philip Hefner

52 papers receiving 192 citations

Peers

Philip Hefner
Comparison fields: 5 of 50
  • History and Philosophy of Science 54
  • Philosophy 106
  • Religious studies 37
  • Health 26
  • Sociology and Political Science 107
Replace Willem B. Drees with:
Willem B. Drees Netherlands
Niels Henrik Gregersen Denmark
J. Wentzel van Huyssteen United States
Alan G. Padgett United States
William J. Wainwright United States
Gordon D. Kaufman United States
Bruce R. Reichenbach United States
Austin Farrer United Kingdom
David Basinger United States
Anne L. C. Runehov Sweden
Philip Hefner relative to Willem B. Drees Netherlands Willem B. Drees's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Willem B. Drees · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Philip Hefner

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Philip Hefner's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Philip Hefner with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Philip Hefner more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Philip Hefner

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Philip Hefner. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Philip Hefner. The network helps show where Philip Hefner may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 8 scholars most cited alongside Philip Hefner, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Philip Hefner Line = papers co-authored together Philip Hefner links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 62 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200243
2 200923
3 198811
4 199110
5 19989
6 19979
7 19648
8 20057
9 20106
10 20106
11 20145
12 19895
13 20025
14 20035
15 19844
16 20064
17 19804
18 19843
19 19963
20 19923

About Philip Hefner

Philip Hefner is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Philosophy, History and Philosophy of Science, Religious studies and Health, having authored 62 papers that have together received 240 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Religion, Ecology, and Ethics (15 papers), Theology and Philosophy of Evil (12 papers), Religious Studies and Spiritual Practices (11 papers), Evolution and Science Education (11 papers), Religion and Society Interactions (10 papers), Biblical Studies and Interpretation (8 papers), Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology (7 papers) and Paranormal Experiences and Beliefs (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in History and Philosophy of Science (54 citations), Philosophy (106 citations), Religious studies (37 citations), Health (26 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (107 citations). Philip Hefner has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Ireland. Frequent co-authors include Jaroslav Pelikán, Mary Evelyn Tucker, Clifford N. Matthews, James F. Moore, Gordon D. Kaufman, Gayle E. Woloschak, Norbert M. Samuelson and Robert L. Moore. Their work appears in journals such as Zygon®, The Journal of Religion, Theology and Science, Church History and International Journal for the Psychology of Religion.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact