Countries where authors publish in The Journal of Religion
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in The Journal of Religion. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in The Journal of Religion with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites The Journal of Religion more than expected).
Fields of papers published in The Journal of Religion
This network shows the impact of papers published in The Journal of Religion. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in The Journal of Religion.
About The Journal of Religion
The 1.1k papers published in The Journal of Religion in the last decades have received a total of 4.2k indexed citations . Papers published in The Journal of Religion usually cover Religious studies (334 papers), Philosophy (445 papers), Classics (58 papers), History (154 papers) and Sociology and Political Science (511 papers) specifically the topics of Religion and Society Interactions (240 papers), Biblical Studies and Interpretation (218 papers), American Constitutional Law and Politics (132 papers), Theology and Philosophy of Evil (104 papers), Reformation and Early Modern Christianity (89 papers), Medieval Philosophy and Theology (80 papers), Historical and Linguistic Studies (71 papers) and Religious Studies and Spiritual Practices (67 papers). The most active scholars publishing in The Journal of Religion are Peter D’Arcy Harrison, Richard A. Horsley, Hans Jonas, Hans Dieter Betz, Kevin Schilbrack, Amy M. Hollywood, Langdon B. Gilkey, Schubert M. Ogden, Jorunn Jacobsen Buckley and Joel Marcus.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.