Philip Grewe

591 citations
24 papers · 385 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

Philip Grewe

23 papers receiving 382 citations

Peers

Philip Grewe
Comparison fields: 5 of 63
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 196
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 128
  • Human-Computer Interaction 26
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 54
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 51
Replace Emmanuel Bui-Quoc with:
Emmanuel Bui-Quoc France
Daniel J. Pittman Canada
Chiara Pinardi Italy
Amelia M. Carton United Kingdom
Julia Berneiser Germany
Gila Z. Reckess United States
Judith van Andel Netherlands
Alicia Peltsch Canada
Piergiorgio d’Orio Italy
Wouter Braet United Kingdom
Philip Grewe relative to Emmanuel Bui-Quoc France Emmanuel Bui-Quoc's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.6×
Emmanuel Bui-Quoc · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Philip Grewe

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Philip Grewe's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Philip Grewe with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Philip Grewe more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Philip Grewe

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Philip Grewe. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Philip Grewe. The network helps show where Philip Grewe may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Philip Grewe, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Philip Grewe Line = papers co-authored together Philip Grewe links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 24 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201697
2 201949
3 201343
4 201339
5 201632
6 201830
7 202215
8 202211
9 201311
10 201911
11 20199
12 20235
13 20135
14 20244
15 20224
16 20174
17 20124
18 20233
19 20193
20 20143

About Philip Grewe

Philip Grewe is a scholar working on Psychiatry and Mental health, Cognitive Neuroscience, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition and Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, having authored 24 papers that have together received 385 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Epilepsy research and treatment (11 papers), Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (5 papers), Face Recognition and Perception (3 papers), Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts (3 papers), Pharmacological Effects and Toxicity Studies (3 papers), Memory and Neural Mechanisms (3 papers), Augmented Reality Applications (3 papers) and Surgical Simulation and Training (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Psychiatry and Mental health (196 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (128 citations), Human-Computer Interaction (26 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (54 citations) and Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (51 citations). Philip Grewe has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United States and Spain. Frequent co-authors include Christian G. Bien, Thilo Kalbhenn, Martina Piefke, Friedrich G. Woermann, Reinhard Schulz, Thomas Cloppenborg, Theodor W. May, Ingmar Blümcke, Tilman Polster and Mario Botsch. Their work appears in journals such as Epilepsy & Behavior, Epilepsia, Neurology, Journal of Neurology Neurosurgery & Psychiatry and Cortex.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact