Philip E. Sonnet

4.0k citations
160 papers · 3.0k · h-index 31

Impact in

    • Insect and Pesticide Research
    • Insect Pheromone Research and Control
    • Insect-Plant Interactions and Control

Papers in

Philip E. Sonnet

158 papers receiving 2.7k citations

Peers

Philip E. Sonnet
Comparison fields: 5 of 99
  • Insect Science 1.0k
  • Organic Chemistry 972
  • Biochemistry 226
  • Spectroscopy 447
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 390
Replace Francisco Camps with:
Francisco Camps Spain
Hans Jürgen Bestmann Germany
Clive A. Henrick United States
Izuru YAMAMOTO Japan
Tetsuto Tsunoda Japan
Morifusa Etō Japan
Hisashi Miyagawa Japan
Keisuke Kitamura Japan
Arnaldo Dossena Italy
Norman F. Janes United States
Philip E. Sonnet relative to Francisco Camps Spain Francisco Camps's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Francisco Camps · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Philip E. Sonnet

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Philip E. Sonnet's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Philip E. Sonnet with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Philip E. Sonnet more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Philip E. Sonnet

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Philip E. Sonnet. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Philip E. Sonnet. The network helps show where Philip E. Sonnet may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Philip E. Sonnet, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Philip E. Sonnet Line = papers co-authored together Philip E. Sonnet links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 160 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1973197
2 198091
3 197678
4 196674
5 198668
6 198967
7 197962
8 198760
9 197453
10 198052
11 197651
12 197550
13 198049
14 197548
15 198846
16 198244
17 197743
18 199143
19 197543
20 197540

About Philip E. Sonnet

Philip E. Sonnet is a scholar working on Insect Science, Organic Chemistry, Molecular Biology, Spectroscopy and Genetics, having authored 160 papers that have together received 3.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Analytical Chemistry and Chromatography (31 papers), Insect and Pesticide Research (29 papers), Enzyme Catalysis and Immobilization (26 papers), Insect Pheromone Research and Control (23 papers), Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior (20 papers), Molecular spectroscopy and chirality (19 papers), Microbial Metabolic Engineering and Bioproduction (16 papers) and Asymmetric Synthesis and Catalysis (15 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Insect Science (1.0k citations), Organic Chemistry (972 citations), Biochemistry (226 citations), Spectroscopy (447 citations) and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (390 citations). Philip E. Sonnet has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Singapore and Czechia. Frequent co-authors include Robert R. Heath, Mary Welch Baillargeon, Richard W. Miller, James E. Oliver, Thomas A. Foglia, Morton Beroza, E. C. Uebel, James H. Tumlinson, Gerald P. McNeill and B. A. Bierl. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Organic Chemistry, Journal of the American Oil Chemists Society, Journal of Chemical Ecology, Environmental Entomology and Journal of Chromatography A.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact