Philip E. Sonnet

166 papers receiving 3.0k citations

Peers

Philip E. Sonnet
Comparison fields: 5 of 103
  • Insect Science 1.2k
  • Biochemistry 277
  • Organic Chemistry 1.1k
  • Spectroscopy 500
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 457
Replace Francisco Camps with:
Francisco Camps Spain
Hans Jürgen Bestmann Germany
Clive A. Henrick United States
Hanhong Xu China
Paul A. Hedin United States
Izuru YAMAMOTO Japan
Ángel Guerrero Spain
Akikazu Hatanaka Japan
Irena Valterová Czechia
Howard J. Williams United States
Philip E. Sonnet relative to Francisco Camps Spain Francisco Camps's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Francisco Camps · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Philip E. Sonnet

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Philip E. Sonnet's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Philip E. Sonnet with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Philip E. Sonnet more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Philip E. Sonnet

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Philip E. Sonnet. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Philip E. Sonnet. The network helps show where Philip E. Sonnet may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Philip E. Sonnet, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Philip E. Sonnet Line = papers co-authored together Philip E. Sonnet links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 171 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1973213
2 198098
3 197684
4 196683
5 198975
6 198673
7 197971
8 198769
9 197466
10 198059
11 197558
12 198255
13 197553
14 198053
15 197652
16 197549
17 198349
18 197748
19 198848
20 197546

About Philip E. Sonnet

Philip E. Sonnet is a scholar working on Insect Science, Organic Chemistry, Molecular Biology, Spectroscopy and Genetics, having authored 171 papers that have together received 3.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Insect and Pesticide Research (31 papers), Analytical Chemistry and Chromatography (31 papers), Enzyme Catalysis and Immobilization (28 papers), Insect Pheromone Research and Control (27 papers), Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior (21 papers), Molecular spectroscopy and chirality (20 papers), Microbial Metabolic Engineering and Bioproduction (17 papers) and Asymmetric Synthesis and Catalysis (15 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Insect Science (1.2k citations), Biochemistry (277 citations), Organic Chemistry (1.1k citations), Spectroscopy (500 citations) and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (457 citations). Philip E. Sonnet has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Singapore and Czechia. Frequent co-authors include Robert R. Heath, Mary Welch Baillargeon, Richard W. Miller, James E. Oliver, Morton Beroza, Thomas A. Foglia, E. C. Uebel, James H. Tumlinson, Gerald P. McNeill and P. L. Guss. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Organic Chemistry, Journal of Chemical Ecology, Journal of the American Oil Chemists Society, Environmental Entomology and Journal of Economic Entomology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact