Philip Dickison

17 papers receiving 343 citations

Peers

Philip Dickison
Comparison fields: 5 of 59
  • Research and Theory 30
  • Issues, ethics and legal aspects 30
  • Family Practice 31
  • Emergency Medical Services 42
  • Applied Psychology 26
Replace Louise Boyer with:
Louise Boyer Canada
Elizabeth Berragan United Kingdom
Barbara Wilson-Keates Canada
Dorothy J. del Bueno United States
KT Waxman United States
Gwen Leigh United States
Barbara Covington United States
Laura A. Killam Canada
Michelle Hughes Canada
Rodrigo Guimarães dos Santos Almeida Brazil
Philip Dickison relative to Louise Boyer Canada Louise Boyer's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.3×
Louise Boyer · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Philip Dickison

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Philip Dickison's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Philip Dickison with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Philip Dickison more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Philip Dickison

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Philip Dickison. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Philip Dickison. The network helps show where Philip Dickison may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 18 scholars most cited alongside Philip Dickison, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Philip Dickison Line = papers co-authored together Philip Dickison links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

19 of 19 papers shown
#Work
1 2019116
2 200282
3
Building a Method for Writing Clinical Judgment Items for Entry-Level Nursing Exams
201936
4
Assessing Higher-Order Cognitive Constructs by Using an Information-Processing Framework
201633
5 200624
6 200522
7 202216
8 200514
9 201212
10 202012
11 200810
12 20175
13 20145
14 20144
15 20114
16
Setting an English Language Proficiency Passing Standard for Entry-Level Nursing Practice Using the Pearson Test of English Academic
20103
17 20131
18 20121
19 20240

About Philip Dickison

Philip Dickison is a scholar working on Issues, ethics and legal aspects, Management Science and Operations Research, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Physiology and Education, having authored 19 papers that have together received 400 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Psychometric Methodologies and Testing (4 papers), Nursing Diagnosis and Documentation (4 papers), Simulation-Based Education in Healthcare (3 papers), Nursing Education, Practice, and Leadership (3 papers), Human Resource Development and Performance Evaluation (2 papers), Patient Safety and Medication Errors (2 papers), Health Education and Validation (2 papers) and Interprofessional Education and Collaboration (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Research and Theory (30 citations), Issues, ethics and legal aspects (30 citations), Family Practice (31 citations), Emergency Medical Services (42 citations) and Applied Psychology (26 citations). Philip Dickison has collaborated with scholars based in United States, India and Finland. Frequent co-authors include Kathie Lasater, Katie Anne Adamson, Roger Levine, William E. Brown, Darlene Russ‐Eft, Ada Woo, Xiao Luo, Do Young ‍Kim, Thomas E. Platt and David Hostler. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Nursing Regulation, Journal of Nursing Education, Prehospital Emergency Care, Applied Psychological Measurement and Human Resource Development Quarterly.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact