Philip D. Walker

18 papers receiving 400 citations

Peers

Philip D. Walker
Comparison fields: 5 of 78
  • Family Practice 76
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 30
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology 18
  • Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 6
  • Emergency Medicine 26
Replace Georgios Gkountouras with:
Georgios Gkountouras United Kingdom
Sisira Jayathissa New Zealand
Larry S. Magder United States
Elizabeth L. Eby United States
K. M. McDonald United States
Maria Dolores Nieto‐Martín Spain
Devesh S. Dahale United States
Ana C. De Roo United States
Antonio Zapatero Gaviria Spain
Kristin Snackey Alvarez United States
Philip D. Walker relative to Georgios Gkountouras United Kingdom Georgios Gkountouras's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×4.3×
Georgios Gkountouras · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Philip D. Walker

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Philip D. Walker's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Philip D. Walker with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Philip D. Walker more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Philip D. Walker

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Philip D. Walker. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Philip D. Walker. The network helps show where Philip D. Walker may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Philip D. Walker, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Philip D. Walker Line = papers co-authored together Philip D. Walker links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 2010152
2 202386
3 202248
4 202037
5 202123
6 202222
7 202115
8 20248
9 20096
10 20205
11 20223
12 20251
13
Making What Matters Count
20151
14 20091
15 20211
16 20221
17 20221
18 20211
19 20240
20 20250

About Philip D. Walker

Philip D. Walker is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Issues, ethics and legal aspects, Family Practice and Health Information Management, having authored 20 papers that have together received 412 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Health Policy Implementation Science (3 papers), Health Sciences Research and Education (3 papers), Opioid Use Disorder Treatment (2 papers), Infection Control and Ventilation (1 paper), COVID-19 Clinical Research Studies (1 paper), Nursing Diagnosis and Documentation (1 paper), Biomedical Text Mining and Ontologies (1 paper) and Antibiotics Pharmacokinetics and Efficacy (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Family Practice (76 citations), Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (30 citations), Geriatrics and Gerontology (18 citations), Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology (6 citations) and Emergency Medicine (26 citations). Philip D. Walker has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Ireland. Frequent co-authors include Anupama Kalsekar, Lizheng Shi, Jinan Liu, Manjiri D. Pawaskar, Vivian Andrew Fonseca, Matthew C. Morris, Mary S. Dietrich, Sarah S. Osmundson, Stephen P. Bruehl and Amanda L. Stone. Their work appears in journals such as Medical Reference Services Quarterly, Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, BMJ Open, JAMA Network Open and Nicotine & Tobacco Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact