Philip Boyle

473 citations
12 papers · 265 · h-index 8

Impact in

Papers in

Philip Boyle

11 papers receiving 241 citations

Peers

Philip Boyle
Comparison fields: 5 of 69
  • Gender Studies 83
  • Sociology and Political Science 209
  • Urban Studies 17
  • Issues, ethics and legal aspects 3
  • Political Science and International Relations 58
Replace Janet E. Kodras with:
Janet E. Kodras United States
Ben Gidley United Kingdom
Agustín Salvia Argentina
Geneviève Pruvost France
Laura Zanotti United States
Michaela Schier Germany
Kaela Jubas Canada
Sofya Aptekar United States
Abdul Hadi Indonesia
Markus-Michael Müller Germany
Philip Boyle relative to Janet E. Kodras United States Janet E. Kodras's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Janet E. Kodras · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Philip Boyle

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Philip Boyle's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Philip Boyle with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Philip Boyle more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Philip Boyle

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Philip Boyle. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Philip Boyle. The network helps show where Philip Boyle may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 7 scholars most cited alongside Philip Boyle, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Philip Boyle Line = papers co-authored together Philip Boyle links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

12 of 12 papers shown
#Work
1 2009135
2 201235
3 201622
4 201121
5 200113
6 201410
7 20129
8 20197
9 20195
10 19925
11 20123
12
Shedding light on organizational ethics. Five ethicists help define and contextualize an elusive topic.
20060

About Philip Boyle

Philip Boyle is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Political Science and International Relations, Public Administration, Urban Studies and Civil and Structural Engineering, having authored 12 papers that have together received 265 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Disaster Management and Resilience (4 papers), Global Security and Public Health (3 papers), Sport and Mega-Event Impacts (2 papers), Public Policy and Administration Research (2 papers), Peacebuilding and International Security (2 papers), Political Influence and Corporate Strategies (1 paper), Infrastructure Resilience and Vulnerability Analysis (1 paper) and Migration, Refugees, and Integration (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Gender Studies (83 citations), Sociology and Political Science (209 citations), Urban Studies (17 citations), Issues, ethics and legal aspects (3 citations) and Political Science and International Relations (58 citations). Philip Boyle has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Kevin D. Haggerty, Gordon P. Whitaker, Suzan Ilcan, Daniel O’Connor, Dominique Clement, Daniel Callahan and Daniel T. O’Brien. Their work appears in journals such as Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews, International Political Sociology, Security Dialogue, Canadian Review of Sociology/Revue canadienne de sociologie and Urban Studies.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact