Janet E. Kodras

21 papers receiving 279 citations

Peers

Janet E. Kodras
Comparison fields: 5 of 57
  • Gender Studies 56
  • Urban Studies 32
  • Sociology and Political Science 177
  • Finance 40
  • Public Administration 12
Replace Amaia Pérez Orozco with:
Amaia Pérez Orozco Brazil
Rebecca Sarker United Kingdom
Sony Pellissery United Kingdom
Brian Ray Canada
Kathleen McCourt United Kingdom
Wally Seccombe Canada
Satish Deshpande India
Peter Wilkin United Kingdom
Kyung‐Sup Chang South Korea
Kieran Connell United Kingdom
Janet E. Kodras relative to Amaia Pérez Orozco Brazil Amaia Pérez Orozco's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.4×
Amaia Pérez Orozco · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Janet E. Kodras

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Janet E. Kodras's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Janet E. Kodras with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Janet E. Kodras more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Janet E. Kodras

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Janet E. Kodras. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Janet E. Kodras. The network helps show where Janet E. Kodras may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 9 scholars most cited alongside Janet E. Kodras, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Janet E. Kodras Line = papers co-authored together Janet E. Kodras links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 21 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 199951
2 199750
3 199043
4 199733
5 197923
6 200521
7 199118
8
Geographic dimensions of United States social policy
199014
9 198614
10 199910
11 19869
12 19948
13 19846
14
The geographic perspective in social policy evaluation : a conceptual approach with application to the U.S. food stamp program /
19835
15 19874
16 20004
17 20014
18 20014
19 19933
20 19882

About Janet E. Kodras

Janet E. Kodras is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Gender Studies, Economics and Econometrics, General Health Professions and Communication, having authored 21 papers that have together received 327 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Urban, Neighborhood, and Segregation Studies (7 papers), Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics (7 papers), Income, Poverty, and Inequality (4 papers), Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth (3 papers), Hermeneutics and Narrative Identity (1 paper), Social Media and Politics (1 paper), Food Security and Health in Diverse Populations (1 paper) and Health, Medicine and Society (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Gender Studies (56 citations), Urban Studies (32 citations), Sociology and Political Science (177 citations), Finance (40 citations) and Public Administration (12 citations). Janet E. Kodras has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Slovakia and Poland. Frequent co-authors include John Paul Jones, David C. Nice, Colin Flint, Lynn A. Staeheli, James Prather, Joanne P. Lasker, Leonard L. LaPointe, John‐Paul Jones and Lawrence A. Brown. Their work appears in journals such as Economic Geography, Geographical Analysis, Political Geography, Research in Higher Education and Information Communication & Society.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact