Daniel O’Connor

2.2k citations
52 papers · 1.4k · h-index 20

Impact in

    • Diversity and Career in Medicine
  • Archeology top 2%
    • Ancient Egypt and Archaeology
    • Archaeology and Historical Studies

Papers in

Daniel O’Connor

49 papers receiving 1.3k citations

Peers

Daniel O’Connor
Comparison fields: 5 of 149
  • Gender Studies 218
  • Archeology 153
  • Family Practice 21
  • Health Informatics 13
  • Applied Psychology 42
Replace John Komlos with:
John Komlos Germany
Jennifer Wenzel United States
Linda L. Smith United States
Joseph Fletcher United States
Lori B. Andrews United States
Brad Love United States
Paul Bernard Canada
Maggie Walter Australia
John D. Kelly United States
Pamela Sankar United States
Daniel O’Connor relative to John Komlos Germany John Komlos's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.7×
John Komlos · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel O’Connor

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel O’Connor's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel O’Connor with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel O’Connor more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel O’Connor

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel O’Connor. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel O’Connor. The network helps show where Daniel O’Connor may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniel O’Connor, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel O’Connor Line = papers co-authored together Daniel O’Connor links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 52 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2017171
2 2016165
3 2017164
4 1986107
5 198392
6 201771
7 201564
8 201653
9 200343
10 202035
11 200530
12 201329
13 201325
14 201624
15 201324
16 200822
17 197222
18 200521
19 200420
20 200719

About Daniel O’Connor

Daniel O’Connor is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Political Science and International Relations, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Surgery and General Health Professions, having authored 52 papers that have together received 1.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Policing Practices and Perceptions (6 papers), Ancient Egypt and Archaeology (3 papers), Diversity and Career in Medicine (3 papers), Consumer Attitudes and Food Labeling (3 papers), Archaeology and Historical Studies (3 papers), Crime Patterns and Interventions (3 papers), Disaster Management and Resilience (2 papers) and RNA Interference and Gene Delivery (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Gender Studies (218 citations), Archeology (153 citations), Family Practice (21 citations), Health Informatics (13 citations) and Applied Psychology (42 citations). Daniel O’Connor has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Mike Conway, Vineet M. Arora, Arjun Dayal, Randy K. Lippert, Bruce G. Trigger, Alan B. Lloyd, Barry J. Kemp, Anna S. Mueller, Melissa Osborne and Suzan Ilcan. Their work appears in journals such as Proceedings of The Nutrition Society, Policing & Society, Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology, JAMA Dermatology and Alternatives Global Local Political.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact