Daniel T. O’Brien

70 papers receiving 1.3k citations

Peers

Daniel T. O’Brien
Comparison fields: 5 of 145
  • Aging 41
  • Transportation 140
  • Health 159
  • Sociology and Political Science 645
  • Public Administration 48
Replace Mark Tranmer with:
Mark Tranmer United Kingdom
Brandon C. Welsh United States
Terri Mannarini Italy
Emily Gray United Kingdom
Brandon C. Welsh United States
Chris Hale United States
Edward Hall United Kingdom
Valerie A. Haines Canada
Ingunn Moser Norway
Steve Reicher United Kingdom
Daniel T. O’Brien relative to Mark Tranmer United Kingdom Mark Tranmer's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×20×30×41×
Mark Tranmer · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel T. O’Brien

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel T. O’Brien's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel T. O’Brien with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel T. O’Brien more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel T. O’Brien

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel T. O’Brien. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel T. O’Brien. The network helps show where Daniel T. O’Brien may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniel T. O’Brien, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel T. O’Brien Line = papers co-authored together Daniel T. O’Brien links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 75 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2018115
2 200995
3 201594
4 201659
5 201556
6 201855
7 201152
8 201850
9 201050
10 201344
11 200738
12 201237
13 201637
14 201136
15 201631
16 200930
17 201829
18 201228
19 201627
20 200226

About Daniel T. O’Brien

Daniel T. O’Brien is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, General Health Professions, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Clinical Psychology and Transportation, having authored 75 papers that have together received 1.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Crime Patterns and Interventions (22 papers), Homelessness and Social Issues (12 papers), Urban, Neighborhood, and Segregation Studies (9 papers), Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior (8 papers), Laser-Ablation Synthesis of Nanoparticles (6 papers), Laser-induced spectroscopy and plasma (5 papers), Urban Transport and Accessibility (5 papers) and Crime, Illicit Activities, and Governance (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Aging (41 citations), Transportation (140 citations), Health (159 citations), Sociology and Political Science (645 citations) and Public Administration (48 citations). Daniel T. O’Brien has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Canada. Frequent co-authors include David Sloan Wilson, Robert J. Sampson, Chelsea Farrell, Christopher Winship, Andrew C. Gallup, Brandon C. Welsh, Daniel D. White, David Sloan Wilson, Eric Gordon and Brandon C. Welsh. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Quantitative Criminology, American Journal of Community Psychology, Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, PLoS ONE and Scientific Reports.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact