Philip Beh
Impact in
- Clinical Psychology top 10%
- Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
- Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health
Papers in
-
- Suicide and Self-Harm Studies 4
- Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health 3
-
- Cancer-related gene regulation 2
- Co-authors
- Janneke Frambach (1 shared paper)Cees van der Vleuten (1 shared paper)Erik W. Driessen (1 shared paper)Wincy S. C. Chan (3 shared papers)Paul Wong (3 shared papers)Paul Yip (2 shared papers)Yik Wa Law (1 shared paper)Kayuet Liu (1 shared paper)
In The Last Decade
Philip Beh
22 papers receiving 455 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 102
- Clinical Psychology 142
- Health 30
- Social Psychology 56
- Education 66
- Communication 14
Countries citing papers authored by Philip Beh
This map shows the geographic impact of Philip Beh's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Philip Beh with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Philip Beh more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Philip Beh
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Philip Beh. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Philip Beh. The network helps show where Philip Beh may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Philip Beh, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 23 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2013 | 111 | |
| 2 | 2006 | 108 | |
| 3 | 2007 | 54 | |
| 4 | 2013 | 27 | |
| 5 | 2007 | 26 | |
| 6 | 2009 | 24 | |
| 7 | 2008 | 22 | |
| 8 | 2006 | 16 | |
| 9 | 2010 | 13 | |
| 10 | 2004 | 12 | |
| 11 | End-of-life care: towards a more dignified dying process in residential care homes for the elderly. | 2010 | 11 |
| 12 | 2017 | 10 | |
| 13 | End-of-life care In Hong Kong | 2011 | 8 |
| 14 | 2007 | 7 | |
| 15 | 2014 | 7 | |
| 16 | 1998 | 7 | |
| 17 | 1998 | 5 | |
| 18 | 2014 | 5 | |
| 19 | 2010 | 4 | |
| 20 | 2020 | 4 |
About Philip Beh
Philip Beh is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Molecular Biology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Surgery and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 23 papers that have together received 484 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Suicide and Self-Harm Studies (4 papers), Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (3 papers), Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health (3 papers), Marine animal studies overview (2 papers), Forensic and Genetic Research (2 papers), Cancer-related gene regulation (2 papers), Homicide, Infanticide, and Child Abuse (2 papers) and Patient Dignity and Privacy (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (142 citations), Health (30 citations), Social Psychology (56 citations), Education (66 citations) and Communication (14 citations). Philip Beh has collaborated with scholars based in Hong Kong, China and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Janneke Frambach, Cees van der Vleuten, Erik W. Driessen, Wincy S. C. Chan, Paul Wong, Paul Yip, Yik Wa Law, Kayuet Liu, Sandra Sau Man Chan and Karen K. L. Chan. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal of Molecular Medicine, Forensic Science International, Forensic Science Medicine and Pathology, Homicide Studies and Studies in Higher Education.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.