Forensic Science International Genetics

57.7k citations
2.2k papers · · active since 1950

Impact in

  • Genetics top 2%
    • Forensic and Genetic Research
    • Genetic diversity and population structure
    • Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
  • Archeology top 1%
    • Forensic Anthropology and Bioarchaeology Studies

Papers in

    • Forensic and Genetic Research 1.6k
    • Genetic diversity and population structure 344
    • Genetic Associations and Epidemiology 204
    • Molecular Biology Techniques and Applications 1.1k
    • Identification and Quantification in Food 230
    • Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies 171

Forensic Science International Genetics

2.2k papers receiving 56.2k citations

Peers

Forensic Science International Genetics
Comparison fields: 5 of 216
  • Genetics 41.5k
  • Archeology 5.7k
  • Molecular Biology 35.8k
  • Ecology 10.6k
  • Safety Research 1.4k
Replace International Journal of Legal Medicine with:
International Journal of Legal Medicine Germany
Annals of Human Genetics United Kingdom
BioTechniques United States
European Journal of Human Genetics United States
Nature Ecology & Evolution United States
PLoS Biology United States
Human Biology United States
Legal Medicine Japan
BMC Evolutionary Biology United States
Journal of Proteomics China
Forensic Science International Genetics relative to International Journal of Legal Medicine Germany International Journal of Legal Medicine's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.1×
International Journal of Legal Medicine · 1×
Citations per year

Countries where authors publish in Forensic Science International Genetics

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Forensic Science International Genetics. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Forensic Science International Genetics with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Forensic Science International Genetics more than expected).

Fields of papers published in Forensic Science International Genetics

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Forensic Science International Genetics. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Forensic Science International Genetics.

About Forensic Science International Genetics

The 2.2k papers published in Forensic Science International Genetics in the last decades have received a total of 57.7k indexed citations . Papers published in Forensic Science International Genetics usually cover Genetics (1.8k papers), Molecular Biology (1.5k papers), Archeology (203 papers), Ecology (385 papers) and Urology (30 papers) specifically the topics of Forensic and Genetic Research (1.6k papers), Molecular Biology Techniques and Applications (1.1k papers), Genetic diversity and population structure (344 papers), Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies (330 papers), Identification and Quantification in Food (230 papers), Genetic Associations and Epidemiology (204 papers), Forensic Anthropology and Bioarchaeology Studies (197 papers) and Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies (171 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Forensic Science International Genetics are Walther Parson, Manfred Kayser, Niels Morling, John Buckleton, Christopher Phillips, Duncan Taylor, Jo‐Anne Bright, Peter Gill, Roland A.H. van Oorschot and Titia Sijen.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact