P.H. Schimpf

37 papers receiving 1k citations

Peers

P.H. Schimpf
Comparison fields: 5 of 81
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 594
  • Mathematical Physics 116
  • Neurology 40
  • Geophysics 70
  • Signal Processing 37
Replace Ceon Ramon with:
Ceon Ramon United States
Andreas A. Ioannides United Kingdom
Hannes Nowak Germany
Michael Eiselt Germany
Roberta Grech Belgium
Joseph Muscat Malta
Manfried Hoke Germany
Hans-Aloys Wischmann Germany
Stephen B. Baumann United States
Tracey A. Camilleri Malta
P.H. Schimpf relative to Ceon Ramon United States Ceon Ramon's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.6×
Ceon Ramon · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by P.H. Schimpf

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of P.H. Schimpf's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by P.H. Schimpf with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites P.H. Schimpf more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by P.H. Schimpf

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by P.H. Schimpf. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by P.H. Schimpf. The network helps show where P.H. Schimpf may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside P.H. Schimpf, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with P.H. Schimpf Line = papers co-authored together P.H. Schimpf links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 40 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2002186
2 2006128
3 2002114
4 2007104
5 200479
6 200564
7 199549
8 200433
9 199830
10 201829
11 199828
12 200622
13 199621
14 200620
15 200919
16 200015
17 199911
18 200211
19 200511
20 199510

About P.H. Schimpf

P.H. Schimpf is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Mathematical Physics, Architecture, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine and Signal Processing, having authored 40 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces (16 papers), Numerical methods in inverse problems (8 papers), Cardiac pacing and defibrillation studies (6 papers), Engineering Education and Pedagogy (5 papers), Electrical and Bioimpedance Tomography (5 papers), Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias (5 papers), ECG Monitoring and Analysis (3 papers) and Direction-of-Arrival Estimation Techniques (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cognitive Neuroscience (594 citations), Mathematical Physics (116 citations), Neurology (40 citations), Geophysics (70 citations) and Signal Processing (37 citations). P.H. Schimpf has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Germany and China. Frequent co-authors include Jens Haueisen, Ceon Ramon, Hesheng Liu, Larry R. Vandervert, Yongmin Kim, John W. Belliveau, Van Jay Wedeen, David S. Tuch, John George and Akira Ishimaru. Their work appears in journals such as IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, Physics in Medicine and Biology, BioMedical Engineering OnLine, Brain Topography and Creativity Research Journal.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact