Petr Knoth

78 papers receiving 672 citations

Peers

Petr Knoth
Comparison fields: 5 of 85
  • Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty 140
  • Health Informatics 26
  • Information Systems and Management 131
  • Computer Science Applications 86
  • Information Systems 247
Replace Jodi Schneider with:
Jodi Schneider United States
Kenning Arlitsch United States
Jin Mao China
Alessandro Checco United Kingdom
Ashraf Uddin India
Norman Meuschke Germany
Aliaksandr Birukou Italy
Liz Lyon United States
Qikai Cheng China
Rongying Zhao China
Petr Knoth relative to Jodi Schneider United States Jodi Schneider's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.7×
Jodi Schneider · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Petr Knoth

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Petr Knoth's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Petr Knoth with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Petr Knoth more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Petr Knoth

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Petr Knoth. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Petr Knoth. The network helps show where Petr Knoth may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Petr Knoth, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Petr Knoth Line = papers co-authored together Petr Knoth links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 82 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201599
2 201253
3 201642
4 202236
5 201335
6 202125
7 201723
8 201622
9 202022
10 202319
11 201718
12 202317
13 201816
14 201714
15
Using Explicit Semantic Analysis for Cross-Lingual Link Discovery
201114
16 201214
17 201414
18 202313
19 201813
20
Towards a framework for comparing automatic term recognition methods
200913

About Petr Knoth

Petr Knoth is a scholar working on Artificial Intelligence, Information Systems, Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty, Information Systems and Management and Molecular Biology, having authored 82 papers that have together received 737 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Topic Modeling (23 papers), Semantic Web and Ontologies (19 papers), scientometrics and bibliometrics research (19 papers), Scientific Computing and Data Management (13 papers), Biomedical Text Mining and Ontologies (13 papers), Natural Language Processing Techniques (12 papers), Advanced Text Analysis Techniques (12 papers) and Research Data Management Practices (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty (140 citations), Health Informatics (26 citations), Information Systems and Management (131 citations), Computer Science Applications (86 citations) and Information Systems (247 citations). Petr Knoth has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Austria and United States. Frequent co-authors include Drahomíra Herrmannová, Zdeněk Zdráhal, Nancy Pontika, Allan Hanbury, Wojciech Kusa, Tony Ross‐Hellauer, Thomas Klebel, Annika Wolff, Lukáš Žilka and H. Metzler. Their work appears in journals such as D-Lib Magazine, Quantitative Science Studies, LIBER Quarterly The Journal of the Association of European Research Libraries, Lecture notes in computer science and Language Resources and Evaluation.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact