Emma Stuart

45 papers receiving 695 citations

Peers

Emma Stuart
Comparison fields: 5 of 127
  • Communication 169
  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 29
  • Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty 126
  • Information Systems and Management 85
  • Health Informatics 16
Replace Kim Holmberg with:
Kim Holmberg Finland
Qing Ke China
Shengli Deng China
Jenny Fry United Kingdom
Yin Zhang United States
Howard Rosenbaum United States
Pardeep Sud United Kingdom
Jason Priem United States
Björn Hammarfelt Sweden
Lluís Codina Spain
Emma Stuart relative to Kim Holmberg Finland Kim Holmberg's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×14.5×
Kim Holmberg · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Emma Stuart

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Emma Stuart's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Emma Stuart with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Emma Stuart more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Emma Stuart

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Emma Stuart. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Emma Stuart. The network helps show where Emma Stuart may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Emma Stuart, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Emma Stuart Line = papers co-authored together Emma Stuart links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 46 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200782
2 201961
3 200854
4 200641
5 201838
6
What are Libraries doing on Twitter
201034
7 201534
8 202333
9 201733
10 201428
11 202022
12 201821
13
Social Media Metrics
200919
14 201019
15 200618
16 200717
17 201817
18 202316
19 202315
20 201015

About Emma Stuart

Emma Stuart is a scholar working on Information Systems, Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty, Communication, Information Systems and Management and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 46 papers that have together received 748 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include scientometrics and bibliometrics research (15 papers), Web visibility and informetrics (8 papers), Complex Network Analysis Techniques (7 papers), Meta-analysis and systematic reviews (6 papers), Academic Publishing and Open Access (5 papers), Web and Library Services (4 papers), Research Data Management Practices (4 papers) and Social Media and Politics (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Communication (169 citations), Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (29 citations), Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty (126 citations), Information Systems and Management (85 citations) and Health Informatics (16 citations). Emma Stuart has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Spain and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Mike Thelwall, Meiko Makita, Amalia Más-Bleda, Kayvan Kousha, Mahshid Abdoli, Jonathan M. Levitt, Paul Wilson, Gareth Harries, Iain Hrynaszkiewicz and Farida Vis. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, Online Information Review, Journal of Data and Information Science, Journal of Documentation and Quantitative Science Studies.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact