Emma Stuart

47 papers receiving 806 citations

Peers

Emma Stuart
Comparison fields: 5 of 125
  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 36
  • Communication 179
  • Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty 137
  • Health Informatics 21
  • Information Systems and Management 85
Replace Lluís Codina with:
Lluís Codina Spain
Qing Ke China
Jenny Fry United Kingdom
Pardeep Sud United Kingdom
Björn Hammarfelt Sweden
Howard Rosenbaum United States
Juan Ignacio Gorraiz Austria
Chérifa Boukacem‐Zeghmouri France
Christian Gumpenberger Austria
Giovanni Colavizza Netherlands
Emma Stuart relative to Lluís Codina Spain Lluís Codina's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5×12×
Lluís Codina · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Emma Stuart

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Emma Stuart's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Emma Stuart with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Emma Stuart more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Emma Stuart

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Emma Stuart. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Emma Stuart. The network helps show where Emma Stuart may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Emma Stuart, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Emma Stuart Line = papers co-authored together Emma Stuart links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 49 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200789
2 201979
3 200855
4 200654
5 201849
6 202344
7
What are Libraries doing on Twitter
201037
8 201737
9 201536
10 201429
11 202024
12 201823
13 201022
14 202322
15 202321
16 200620
17 201818
18 201018
19 201717
20 200717

About Emma Stuart

Emma Stuart is a scholar working on Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty, Information Systems, Information Systems and Management, Communication and Statistical and Nonlinear Physics, having authored 49 papers that have together received 872 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include scientometrics and bibliometrics research (16 papers), Web visibility and informetrics (9 papers), Meta-analysis and systematic reviews (6 papers), Complex Network Analysis Techniques (6 papers), Academic Publishing and Open Access (5 papers), Research Data Management Practices (4 papers), Web and Library Services (4 papers) and Scientific Computing and Data Management (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (36 citations), Communication (179 citations), Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty (137 citations), Health Informatics (21 citations) and Information Systems and Management (85 citations). Emma Stuart has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Spain and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Mike A Thelwall, Meiko Makita, Amalia Más-Bleda, Kayvan Kousha, Mahshid Abdoli, Paul Wilson, Jonathan M. Levitt, Iain Hrynaszkiewicz, Gareth Harries and Arnold Verbeek. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, Online Information Review, Journal of Data and Information Science, Quantitative Science Studies and Scientometrics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact