Emma Stuart

49 papers receiving 807 citations

Peers

Emma Stuart
Comparison fields: 5 of 126
  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 36
  • Communication 186
  • Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty 136
  • Health Informatics 18
  • Information Systems and Management 90
Replace Kim Holmberg with:
Kim Holmberg Finland
Lluís Codina Spain
Jenny Fry United Kingdom
Howard Rosenbaum United States
Pardeep Sud United Kingdom
John P. Walsh United States
Qing Ke China
Giovanni Colavizza Netherlands
Björn Hammarfelt Sweden
Tibor Koltay Hungary
Emma Stuart relative to Kim Holmberg Finland Kim Holmberg's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×15×18×
Kim Holmberg · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Emma Stuart

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Emma Stuart's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Emma Stuart with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Emma Stuart more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Emma Stuart

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Emma Stuart. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Emma Stuart. The network helps show where Emma Stuart may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Emma Stuart, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Emma Stuart Line = papers co-authored together Emma Stuart links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 51 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200794
2 201978
3 200858
4 200655
5 201844
6 202339
7
What are Libraries doing on Twitter
201038
8 201536
9 201735
10 201428
11
Social Media Metrics
200925
12 201822
13 202022
14 201021
15 200621
16 202319
17 202319
18 201818
19 201018
20 201717

About Emma Stuart

Emma Stuart is a scholar working on Information Systems, Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty, Communication, Information Systems and Management and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 51 papers that have together received 887 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include scientometrics and bibliometrics research (16 papers), Web visibility and informetrics (9 papers), Complex Network Analysis Techniques (7 papers), Meta-analysis and systematic reviews (6 papers), Academic Publishing and Open Access (5 papers), Web and Library Services (4 papers), Research Data Management Practices (4 papers) and Digital Communication and Language (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (36 citations), Communication (186 citations), Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty (136 citations), Health Informatics (18 citations) and Information Systems and Management (90 citations). Emma Stuart has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Spain and Sri Lanka. Frequent co-authors include Mike Thelwall, Meiko Makita, Amalia Más-Bleda, Kayvan Kousha, Mahshid Abdoli, Paul Wilson, Jonathan M. Levitt, Gareth Harries, Iain Hrynaszkiewicz and Olga I. Goriunova. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, Online Information Review, Journal of Data and Information Science, Quantitative Science Studies and Journal of Documentation.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact