Peter Weissmann
Impact in
- Family Practice top 5%
- Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills
-
- Innovations in Medical Education
- Medical Education and Admissions
Papers in
-
- Innovations in Medical Education 6
-
- Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare 2
- Ethics in medical practice 2
- Healthcare cost, quality, practices 1
- Interprofessional Education and Collaboration 1
- Co-authors
- Paul Haidet (5 shared papers)William T. Branch (6 shared papers)Richard M. Frankel (4 shared papers)Catherine Gracey (4 shared papers)Thomas S. Inui (2 shared papers)Gary Mitchell (2 shared papers)Paul T. Cantey (1 shared paper)David E. Kern (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Academic Medicine (3 papers)Journal of General Internal Medicine (1 paper)Annals of Internal Medicine (1 paper)Medical Education Online (1 paper)BMJ Open (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Peter Weissmann
10 papers receiving 396 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 56
- Family Practice 45
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 187
- Psychiatry and Mental health 83
- General Health Professions 86
- Research and Theory 2
Countries citing papers authored by Peter Weissmann
This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Weissmann's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Weissmann with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Weissmann more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Weissmann
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Weissmann. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Weissmann. The network helps show where Peter Weissmann may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 22 scholars most cited alongside Peter Weissmann, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2006 | 199 | |
| 2 | 2008 | 92 | |
| 3 | 2004 | 72 | |
| 4 | 2007 | 30 | |
| 5 | 1992 | 15 | |
| 6 | 2010 | 4 | |
| 7 | 2023 | 2 | |
| 8 | 2006 | 2 | |
| 9 | 2020 | 1 | |
| 10 | 2019 | 1 |
About Peter Weissmann
Peter Weissmann is a scholar working on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, General Health Professions, Psychiatry and Mental health, Family Practice and Surgery, having authored 10 papers that have together received 418 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Innovations in Medical Education (6 papers), Empathy and Medical Education (4 papers), Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills (2 papers), Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare (2 papers), Ethics in medical practice (2 papers), Healthcare cost, quality, practices (1 paper), Cardiovascular Syncope and Autonomic Disorders (1 paper) and Interprofessional Education and Collaboration (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Family Practice (45 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (187 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (83 citations), General Health Professions (86 citations) and Research and Theory (2 citations). Peter Weissmann has collaborated with scholars based in United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Paul Haidet, William T. Branch, Richard M. Frankel, Catherine Gracey, Thomas S. Inui, Gary Mitchell, Paul T. Cantey, David E. Kern, Michael T. Chin and Arthur J. Moss. Their work appears in journals such as Academic Medicine, Journal of General Internal Medicine, Annals of Internal Medicine, Medical Education Online and BMJ Open.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.