Peter Washington

3.2k citations
95 papers · 1.6k · h-index 25

Impact in

Papers in

Peter Washington

83 papers receiving 1.6k citations

Peers

Peter Washington
Comparison fields: 5 of 132
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 807
  • Health Informatics 49
  • Applied Psychology 125
  • Occupational Therapy 86
  • Human-Computer Interaction 71
Replace Nick Haber with:
Nick Haber United States
Agata Rozga United States
Minoo Alemi Iran
Cristina Pop Romania
Serge Thill Netherlands
Ramona Simut Belgium
Kaśka Porayska‐Pomsta United Kingdom
Kenneth Mark Colby United States
Gnanathusharan Rajendran United Kingdom
Cristina Costescu Romania
Peter Washington relative to Nick Haber United States Nick Haber's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.8×
Nick Haber · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Peter Washington

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Washington's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Washington with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Washington more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Washington

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Washington. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Washington. The network helps show where Peter Washington may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Peter Washington, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Peter Washington Line = papers co-authored together Peter Washington links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 95 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2018130
2 2019130
3 201771
4 201964
5 201963
6 201960
7 201855
8 201650
9 201649
10 201840
11 201937
12 202235
13 202233
14 201833
15 201832
16 202231
17 202031
18 202130
19 201729
20 202328

About Peter Washington

Peter Washington is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Education, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Epidemiology and Artificial Intelligence, having authored 95 papers that have together received 1.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Autism Spectrum Disorder Research (33 papers), Child Development and Digital Technology (14 papers), Emotion and Mood Recognition (10 papers), Digital Mental Health Interventions (7 papers), Virology and Viral Diseases (6 papers), Mental Health Research Topics (4 papers), Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies (4 papers) and Mobile Crowdsensing and Crowdsourcing (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cognitive Neuroscience (807 citations), Health Informatics (49 citations), Applied Psychology (125 citations), Occupational Therapy (86 citations) and Human-Computer Interaction (71 citations). Peter Washington has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Taiwan and France. Frequent co-authors include Dennis P. Wall, Jessey Schwartz, Haik Kalantarian, Jena Daniels, Aaron Kline, Nick Haber, Qandeel Tariq, Catalin Voss, Terry Winograd and Carl Feinstein. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Medical Internet Research, Scientific Reports, Applied Sciences, BMC Bioinformatics and npj Digital Medicine.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact