Peter Washington

3.2k citations
99 papers · 1.8k · h-index 26

Impact in

Papers in

Peter Washington

86 papers receiving 1.7k citations

Peers

Peter Washington
Comparison fields: 5 of 137
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 873
  • Health Informatics 59
  • Applied Psychology 130
  • Occupational Therapy 97
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 171
Replace Jena Daniels with:
Jena Daniels United States
Agata Rozga United States
Gnanathusharan Rajendran United Kingdom
Cristina Pop Romania
Serge Thill Netherlands
Mary Ellen Foster United Kingdom
Daniel O. David Romania
Cristina Costescu Romania
Elizabeth S. Kim United States
Mohammed Ehsan Hoque United States
Peter Washington relative to Jena Daniels United States Jena Daniels's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.8×
Jena Daniels · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Peter Washington

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Washington's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Washington with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Washington more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Washington

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Washington. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Washington. The network helps show where Peter Washington may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Peter Washington, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Peter Washington Line = papers co-authored together Peter Washington links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 99 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2018145
2 2019137
3 201779
4 201969
5 201967
6 201964
7 201860
8 201656
9 201654
10 201847
11 201941
12 201837
13 202235
14 201835
15 202234
16 201733
17 202232
18 202032
19 202231
20 202131

About Peter Washington

Peter Washington is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Education, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Artificial Intelligence and Epidemiology, having authored 99 papers that have together received 1.8k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Autism Spectrum Disorder Research (34 papers), Child Development and Digital Technology (14 papers), Emotion and Mood Recognition (10 papers), Digital Mental Health Interventions (8 papers), Virology and Viral Diseases (6 papers), Mental Health Research Topics (4 papers), Machine Learning in Healthcare (4 papers) and Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cognitive Neuroscience (873 citations), Health Informatics (59 citations), Applied Psychology (130 citations), Occupational Therapy (97 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (171 citations). Peter Washington has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Taiwan and France. Frequent co-authors include Dennis P. Wall, Jessey Schwartz, Jena Daniels, Haik Kalantarian, Aaron Kline, Nick Haber, Qandeel Tariq, Catalin Voss, Terry Winograd and Carl Feinstein. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Medical Internet Research, Scientific Reports, npj Digital Medicine, Applied Sciences and Biosensors.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact