Jane L. E

995 citations
21 papers · 666 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

Jane L. E

17 papers receiving 649 citations

Peers

Jane L. E
Comparison fields: 5 of 74
  • Human-Computer Interaction 268
  • Human Factors and Ergonomics 27
  • Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 215
  • Social Psychology 188
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 146
Replace Marynel Vázquez with:
Marynel Vázquez United States
Benjamin Poppinga Germany
Matthias Wölfel Germany
Jun Yamashita Japan
Keita Higuchi Japan
Stefano Burigat Italy
Sara Ljungblad Sweden
Paul Taele United States
Jens Gerken Germany
Ann Morrison Denmark
Jane L. E relative to Marynel Vázquez United States Marynel Vázquez's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.3×
Marynel Vázquez · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jane L. E

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jane L. E's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jane L. E with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jane L. E more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jane L. E

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jane L. E. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jane L. E. The network helps show where Jane L. E may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Jane L. E, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jane L. E Line = papers co-authored together Jane L. E links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 21 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2015224
2 201778
3 201770
4 201870
5 202336
6 201536
7 201733
8 201630
9 202426
10 202018
11 201818
12 20248
13 20198
14 20237
15 20222
16 20241
17 20211
18 20250
19 20230
20 20120

About Jane L. E

Jane L. E is a scholar working on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Human-Computer Interaction, Cognitive Neuroscience, Social Psychology and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, having authored 21 papers that have together received 666 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Design Education and Practice (3 papers), Data Visualization and Analytics (3 papers), Visual Attention and Saliency Detection (3 papers), Tactile and Sensory Interactions (3 papers), Advanced Image and Video Retrieval Techniques (3 papers), Social Robot Interaction and HRI (3 papers), Innovative Human-Technology Interaction (3 papers) and Evacuation and Crowd Dynamics (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Human-Computer Interaction (268 citations), Human Factors and Ergonomics (27 citations), Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (215 citations), Social Psychology (188 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (146 citations). Jane L. E has collaborated with scholars based in United States, South Korea and Singapore. Frequent co-authors include James A. Landay, Jessica R. Cauchard, David Zhao, Parastoo Abtahi, Cynthia L. Bennett, Meredith Ringel Morris, Martez E. Mott, Edward Cutrell, Haijun Xia and Paul Spee. Their work appears in journals such as Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive Mobile Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies, Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, RePEc: Research Papers in Economics, Queensland's institutional digital repository (The University of Queensland) and Creativity and Cognition.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact