Peter Walker

2.7k citations
72 papers · 2.2k · h-index 23

Impact in

Papers in

Peter Walker

70 papers receiving 2.0k citations

Peers

Peter Walker
Comparison fields: 5 of 115
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 1.1k
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 1.1k
  • Sensory Systems 214
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 481
  • Statistics and Probability 277
Replace Eloisa Valenza with:
Eloisa Valenza Italy
Ruth Kimchi Israel
Viola Macchi Cassia Italy
J. Gavin Bremner United Kingdom
David J. Kelly United Kingdom
Vladimir M. Sloutsky United States
Paula M. Niedenthal France
Denis Mareschal United Kingdom
Liezhong Ge China
Christopher M. Conway United States
Peter Walker relative to Eloisa Valenza Italy Eloisa Valenza's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×2.7×
Eloisa Valenza · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Peter Walker

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Walker's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Walker with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Walker more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Walker

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Walker. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Walker. The network helps show where Peter Walker may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Peter Walker, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Peter Walker Line = papers co-authored together Peter Walker links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 72 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1994291
2 2009276
3 1978125
4 200395
5 201087
6 198484
7 197580
8 201276
9 201273
10 198973
11 201263
12 199351
13 198549
14 197948
15 199547
16 201242
17 197439
18 201637
19 201535
20 199834

About Peter Walker

Peter Walker is a scholar working on Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Social Psychology and Statistics and Probability, having authored 72 papers that have together received 2.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Multisensory perception and integration (29 papers), Visual perception and processing mechanisms (19 papers), Color perception and design (12 papers), Child and Animal Learning Development (11 papers), Visual and Cognitive Learning Processes (10 papers), Tactile and Sensory Interactions (10 papers), Reading and Literacy Development (8 papers) and Categorization, perception, and language (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (1.1k citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (1.1k citations), Sensory Systems (214 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (481 citations) and Statistics and Probability (277 citations). Peter Walker has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Malaysia. Frequent co-authors include Graham J. Hitch, Sylvia B. Smith, Laura A. Walker, Brian J. Francis, Karen Mattock, J. Gavin Bremner, Daniel J. Powell, Scott P. Johnson, Uschi Mason and Jo Spring. Their work appears in journals such as Perception, Visual Cognition, Attention Perception & Psychophysics, Memory & Cognition and British Journal of Psychology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact