Peter V. Forrest
Impact in
-
- Philosophy and Theoretical Science
- Theoretical Computer Science top 5%
- History and Theory of Mathematics
Papers in
-
- Philosophy and Theoretical Science 21
- Philosophy 13
- Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics 9
- Study and Philosophy of Religion 3
- Philosophical Ethics and Theory 2
- Co-authors
- D. M. Armstrong (2 shared papers)
- Journals
- Australasian Journal of Philosophy (6 papers)Philosophical Papers (2 papers)Analysis (2 papers)Philosophical Studies (2 papers)Mind (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- AustraliaUnited States
In The Last Decade
Peter V. Forrest
28 papers receiving 307 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 41
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 203
- Theoretical Computer Science 22
- Philosophy 165
- Cognitive Neuroscience 118
- History and Philosophy of Science 56
Countries citing papers authored by Peter V. Forrest
This map shows the geographic impact of Peter V. Forrest's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter V. Forrest with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter V. Forrest more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Peter V. Forrest
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter V. Forrest. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter V. Forrest. The network helps show where Peter V. Forrest may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 1 scholars most cited alongside Peter V. Forrest, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 33 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2002 | 189 | |
| 2 | 1984 | 39 | |
| 3 | 1987 | 33 | |
| 4 | 2005 | 28 | |
| 5 | 2002 | 24 | |
| 6 | 1985 | 13 | |
| 7 | 1988 | 10 | |
| 8 | 2006 | 10 | |
| 9 | 1982 | 9 | |
| 10 | 2006 | 9 | |
| 11 | 1996 | 8 | |
| 12 | 1990 | 6 | |
| 13 | 1992 | 6 | |
| 14 | 2006 | 5 | |
| 15 | 1985 | 4 | |
| 16 | The Dynamics of Belief: A Normative Logic | 1986 | 4 |
| 17 | 2010 | 4 | |
| 18 | 1993 | 3 | |
| 19 | 2007 | 3 | |
| 20 | 2013 | 3 |
About Peter V. Forrest
Peter V. Forrest is a scholar working on Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Philosophy, History and Philosophy of Science, Computational Theory and Mathematics and Theoretical Computer Science, having authored 33 papers that have together received 429 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Philosophy and Theoretical Science (21 papers), Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (9 papers), Study and Philosophy of Religion (3 papers), Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge (3 papers), Philosophical Ethics and Theory (2 papers), Advanced Algebra and Logic (2 papers), Philosophy, Science, and History (2 papers) and Free Will and Agency (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (203 citations), Theoretical Computer Science (22 citations), Philosophy (165 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (118 citations) and History and Philosophy of Science (56 citations). Peter V. Forrest has collaborated with scholars based in Australia and United States. Frequent co-authors include D. M. Armstrong. Their work appears in journals such as Australasian Journal of Philosophy, Philosophical Papers, Analysis, Philosophical Studies and Mind.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.