Peter Trotter

573 citations
41 papers · 373 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

Peter Trotter

39 papers receiving 320 citations

Peers

Peter Trotter
Comparison fields: 5 of 43
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics 302
  • Geometry and Topology 86
  • Management Science and Operations Research 108
  • Algebra and Number Theory 31
  • Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics 12
Replace Stephen D. Comer with:
Stephen D. Comer United States
Keith A. Kearnes United States
Samuel Wolfenstein France
Josef Šlapal Czechia
Marcel Jackson Australia
Bret Tilson United States
M. van de Vel Netherlands
Giovanni Lo Faro Italy
Edward Marczewski Poland
G. Thierrin Canada
Peter Trotter relative to Stephen D. Comer United States Stephen D. Comer's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Stephen D. Comer · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Peter Trotter

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Trotter's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Trotter with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Trotter more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Trotter

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Trotter. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Trotter. The network helps show where Peter Trotter may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 17 scholars most cited alongside Peter Trotter, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Peter Trotter Line = papers co-authored together Peter Trotter links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 41 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 198545
2 200138
3 197729
4 199727
5 202221
6 199518
7 198916
8 198413
9 199112
10 197812
11 199711
12 197410
13 199610
14 19769
15 20229
16 19768
17 19988
18 19828
19 19958
20 19867

About Peter Trotter

Peter Trotter is a scholar working on Computational Theory and Mathematics, Management Science and Operations Research, Geometry and Topology, Algebra and Number Theory and Artificial Intelligence, having authored 41 papers that have together received 373 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include semigroups and automata theory (33 papers), Advanced Algebra and Logic (24 papers), Fuzzy and Soft Set Theory (14 papers), Geometric and Algebraic Topology (7 papers), Rough Sets and Fuzzy Logic (4 papers), Natural Language Processing Techniques (3 papers), Computability, Logic, AI Algorithms (3 papers) and Rings, Modules, and Algebras (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Computational Theory and Mathematics (302 citations), Geometry and Topology (86 citations), Management Science and Operations Research (108 citations), Algebra and Number Theory (31 citations) and Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics (12 citations). Peter Trotter has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United States and Portugal. Frequent co-authors include Francis Pastijn, Takayuki Tamura, Peter R. Jones, Felipé Gonzalez, Pascal Weil, Mikhail V. Volkov, T. E. Hall, Mark Sapir, Samuel Margolis and Karl Auinger. Their work appears in journals such as Semigroup Forum, Journal of Algebra, Journal of Pure and Applied Algebra, Pacific Journal of Mathematics and International Journal of Algebra and Computation.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact