Peter Thomas

123 papers receiving 1.6k citations

Peers

Peter Thomas
Comparison fields: 5 of 186
  • Computer Science Applications 267
  • Medical Laboratory Technology 74
  • Software 84
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 233
  • Communication 115
Replace Randolph G. Bias with:
Randolph G. Bias United States
Mark Perry Canada
Carina Soledad González González Spain
Gordon Rugg United Kingdom
Sebastiano Bagnara Italy
Sofía Ouhbi United Arab Emirates
Lan Umek Slovenia
Kenneth M. Ford United States
John Ferguson United Kingdom
Jean‐Paul Fox Netherlands
Peter Thomas relative to Randolph G. Bias United States Randolph G. Bias's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10.6×
Randolph G. Bias · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Peter Thomas

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Thomas's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Thomas with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Thomas more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Thomas

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Thomas. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Thomas. The network helps show where Peter Thomas may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Peter Thomas, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Peter Thomas Line = papers co-authored together Peter Thomas links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 140 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1992266
2 2000120
3
Distance education via the Internet: the student experience
200086
4 200782
5 198675
6 200267
7 199862
8 199861
9 198652
10 199049
11 201537
12 199331
13
201928
14 200527
15 198526
16
Learning Styles in Distance Education Students Learning to Program.
200223
17 198623
18 201323
19 199022
20
Learning through Collaboration in a Distributed Education Environment
200021

About Peter Thomas

Peter Thomas is a scholar working on Artificial Intelligence, Computer Science Applications, Education, Information Systems and Software, having authored 140 papers that have together received 1.9k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Online and Blended Learning (21 papers), Model-Driven Software Engineering Techniques (15 papers), Software Engineering Research (12 papers), Open Education and E-Learning (12 papers), Online Learning and Analytics (11 papers), Semantic Web and Ontologies (10 papers), Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods (10 papers) and Trauma and Emergency Care Studies (10 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Computer Science Applications (267 citations), Medical Laboratory Technology (74 citations), Software (84 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (233 citations) and Communication (115 citations). Peter Thomas has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Hong Kong. Frequent co-authors include Linda Carswell, Marian Petre, Blaine Price, Neil Smith, Kevin Waugh, Shaíley Minocha, K Campion, Peter J. Quinn, W. Patrick Williams and Carina Paine. Their work appears in journals such as Computers & Education, British Journal of Educational Technology, The American Surgeon, Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Biomembranes and Biochemical Journal.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact