Clinical & Experimental Metastasis

2.4k papers and 75.9k indexed citations i.

About

The 2.4k papers published in Clinical & Experimental Metastasis in the last decades have received a total of 75.9k indexed citations. Papers published in Clinical & Experimental Metastasis usually cover Oncology (1.2k papers), Molecular Biology (1.1k papers) and Cancer Research (704 papers) specifically the topics of Cancer Cells and Metastasis (378 papers), Cell Adhesion Molecules Research (335 papers) and Protease and Inhibitor Mechanisms (259 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Clinical & Experimental Metastasis are Garth L. Nicolson, Danny R. Welch, Alissa M. Weaver, Rićhard P. Hill, Michael J. Duffy, Brunhilde Felding‐Habermann, Alan Wells, Leonard Weiss, Erik Sahai and Michael F. Olson.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Clinical & Experimental Metastasis

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Clinical & Experimental Metastasis. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Clinical & Experimental Metastasis.

Countries where authors publish in Clinical & Experimental Metastasis

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Clinical & Experimental Metastasis. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Clinical & Experimental Metastasis with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Clinical & Experimental Metastasis more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025