Peter Thomas

142 papers receiving 1.9k citations

Peers

Peter Thomas
Comparison fields: 5 of 185
  • Computer Science Applications 312
  • Medical Laboratory Technology 49
  • Software 102
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 270
  • Communication 144
Replace Tapio Salakoski with:
Tapio Salakoski Finland
Randolph G. Bias United States
Mark Perry Canada
Gordon Rugg United Kingdom
Kenneth M. Ford United States
Solomon Sunday Oyelere Finland
Lan Umek Slovenia
Paul Baker United States
Sean Goggins United States
Jean‐Paul Fox Netherlands
Peter Thomas relative to Tapio Salakoski Finland Tapio Salakoski's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6×8.5×
Tapio Salakoski · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Peter Thomas

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Thomas's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Thomas with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Thomas more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Thomas

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Thomas. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Thomas. The network helps show where Peter Thomas may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Peter Thomas, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Peter Thomas Line = papers co-authored together Peter Thomas links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 158 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1992278
2 2000129
3 2007103
4 1986100
5
Distance education via the Internet: the student experience
200092
6 200273
7 199873
8 199869
9 198666
10 199050
11 201539
12 199331
13 200531
14 201930
15 198528
16 198628
17
Learning Styles in Distance Education Students Learning to Program.
200227
18 200425
19 199824
20 201323

About Peter Thomas

Peter Thomas is a scholar working on Computer Science Applications, Artificial Intelligence, Information Systems, Education and Software, having authored 158 papers that have together received 2.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Online and Blended Learning (21 papers), Open Education and E-Learning (15 papers), Model-Driven Software Engineering Techniques (15 papers), Software Engineering Research (13 papers), Online Learning and Analytics (12 papers), Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods (11 papers), Data Visualization and Analytics (10 papers) and Teaching and Learning Programming (10 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Computer Science Applications (312 citations), Medical Laboratory Technology (49 citations), Software (102 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (270 citations) and Communication (144 citations). Peter Thomas has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Hong Kong. Frequent co-authors include Linda Carswell, Marian Petre, Blaine Price, Kevin Waugh, Neil Smith, Shaíley Minocha, Peter J. Quinn, W. Patrick Williams, K Campion and Carina Paine. Their work appears in journals such as Computers & Education, British Journal of Educational Technology, Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Biomembranes, Educational Technology & Society and The American Surgeon.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact