Peter T. Haskell

829 citations
35 papers · 717 · h-index 17

Impact in

Papers in

Peter T. Haskell

33 papers receiving 565 citations

Peers

Peter T. Haskell
Comparison fields: 5 of 52
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 343
  • Developmental Biology 43
  • Insect Science 167
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 273
  • Sensory Systems 30
Replace Asher E. Treat with:
Asher E. Treat United States
Herndon R. Agee United States
Anna Maria Angioy Italy
Jeff W. Dawson Canada
Yuzuru Oguma Japan
Hiroshi Matsubayashi Japan
Sadahiro Tatsuki Japan
Janez Prešern Slovenia
Ryo Nakano Japan
D. Feir
Peter T. Haskell relative to Asher E. Treat United States Asher E. Treat's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×2.8×
Asher E. Treat · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Peter T. Haskell

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter T. Haskell's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter T. Haskell with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter T. Haskell more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter T. Haskell

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter T. Haskell. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter T. Haskell. The network helps show where Peter T. Haskell may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 6 scholars most cited alongside Peter T. Haskell, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Peter T. Haskell Line = papers co-authored together Peter T. Haskell links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 35 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 196970
2 196465
3
Ecotoxicology : pesticides and beneficial organisms
199865
4 196955
5 196252
6 195740
7 196339
8 195638
9 195833
10 195628
11 195626
12 195723
13 195922
14
Pesticide application: principles and practice.
198520
15 196019
16 196619
17 197418
18 195717
19 19589
20 19779

About Peter T. Haskell

Peter T. Haskell is a scholar working on Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Insect Science, Developmental Biology and Parasitology, having authored 35 papers that have together received 717 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Orthoptera Research and Taxonomy (16 papers), Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research (15 papers), Insect-Plant Interactions and Control (6 papers), Insect Pest Control Strategies (4 papers), Insect behavior and control techniques (3 papers), Animal Behavior and Reproduction (3 papers), Animal Vocal Communication and Behavior (3 papers) and Malaria Research and Control (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (343 citations), Developmental Biology (43 citations), Insect Science (167 citations), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (273 citations) and Sensory Systems (30 citations). Peter T. Haskell has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include J.E. Moorhouse, P. K. McEwen, Louis M. Schoonhoven, K.C. Highnam, A. J. Mordue Luntz and Miriam Louisa Rothschild. Their work appears in journals such as Nature, Journal of Insect Physiology, Journal of Experimental Biology, Outlook on Agriculture and Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact