Asher E. Treat

802 citations
33 papers · 597 · h-index 13

Impact in

Papers in

Asher E. Treat

32 papers receiving 515 citations

Peers

Asher E. Treat
Comparison fields: 5 of 49
  • Developmental Biology 110
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 516
  • Insect Science 191
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 96
  • Genetics 145
Replace Hannes Scheuber with:
Hannes Scheuber Switzerland
Hayward G. Spangler United States
H. R. Agee United States
Julie C. Hagelin United States
M Préault France
Rigoberto Solı́s Chile
C. H. Fry United Kingdom
J. H. Fullard Canada
Niels Skals Denmark
Nigella Hillgarth United States
Asher E. Treat relative to Hannes Scheuber Switzerland Hannes Scheuber's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Hannes Scheuber · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Asher E. Treat

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Asher E. Treat's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Asher E. Treat with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Asher E. Treat more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Asher E. Treat

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Asher E. Treat. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Asher E. Treat. The network helps show where Asher E. Treat may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 9 scholars most cited alongside Asher E. Treat, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Asher E. Treat Line = papers co-authored together Asher E. Treat links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 33 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1957145
2
Mites of moths and butterflies
197581
3 195551
4 196838
5 195937
6 199337
7 197023
8 197023
9 195521
10 197614
11 197913
12 199112
13 196512
14 195410
15 19839
16 19629
17 19578
18 19858
19 19808
20 19668

About Asher E. Treat

Asher E. Treat is a scholar working on Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Insect Science, Genetics, Ecology and Developmental Biology, having authored 33 papers that have together received 597 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Study of Mite Species (19 papers), Insect-Plant Interactions and Control (17 papers), Insect and Pesticide Research (8 papers), Lepidoptera: Biology and Taxonomy (7 papers), Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior (5 papers), Bat Biology and Ecology Studies (5 papers), Plant and animal studies (3 papers) and Animal Vocal Communication and Behavior (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Developmental Biology (110 citations), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (516 citations), Insect Science (191 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (96 citations) and Genetics (145 citations). Asher E. Treat has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Switzerland and Israel. Frequent co-authors include Kenneth D. Roeder, Lee A. Miller, Jerry S. VandeBerg, Jerry S. Vande Berg, Donald E. Johnston, Carlos H. W. Flechtmann, R. V. Southcott, George O. Poinar and Jeremy N. McNeil. Their work appears in journals such as Annals of the Entomological Society of America, Acarologia, Journal of Parasitology, American Museum Novitates and Science.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact