Peter Styles

199 papers receiving 9.0k citations

Peers

Peter Styles
Comparison fields: 5 of 180
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 2.0k
  • Geophysics 1.2k
  • Clinical Biochemistry 476
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 1.3k
  • Complementary and alternative medicine 498
Replace Thomas W. Gardner with:
Thomas W. Gardner United States
R. Mark Henkelman Canada
Robert S. Balaban United States
Takashi Miyazaki Japan
Bertil Persson Sweden
W. J. Burke United States
J. David Robertson United States
Iain D. Wilkinson United Kingdom
G. Allan Johnson United States
Michael Larsen Denmark
Peter Styles relative to Thomas W. Gardner United States Thomas W. Gardner's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×7.4×
Thomas W. Gardner · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Peter Styles

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Styles's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Styles with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Styles more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Styles

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Styles. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Styles. The network helps show where Peter Styles may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Peter Styles, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Peter Styles Line = papers co-authored together Peter Styles links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 202 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
Bioenergetics of intact human muscle. A 31P nuclear magnetic resonance study.
1983456
2 2003406
3 2003330
4 1999276
5 1986269
6 2013265
7 1974258
8 2000194
9 2000191
10 2014186
11 2000180
12 1980179
13 2001176
14 2003165
15 2005164
16 1984155
17 1998148
18 1982129
19 1993126
20 2002113

About Peter Styles

Peter Styles is a scholar working on Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Molecular Biology, Geophysics, Spectroscopy and Nuclear and High Energy Physics, having authored 202 papers that have together received 9.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications (50 papers), Advanced NMR Techniques and Applications (26 papers), NMR spectroscopy and applications (24 papers), Mitochondrial Function and Pathology (23 papers), Geophysical and Geoelectrical Methods (17 papers), Seismic Waves and Analysis (15 papers), Geophysical Methods and Applications (14 papers) and earthquake and tectonic studies (12 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (2.0k citations), Geophysics (1.2k citations), Clinical Biochemistry (476 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (1.3k citations) and Complementary and alternative medicine (498 citations). Peter Styles has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Italy. Frequent co-authors include Andrew M. Blamire, D.J. Taylor, Peter J. Bore, G. K. Radda, David Neil Manners, R. W. Girdler, B. Rajagopalan, Raffaele Lodi, Anthony H.V. Schapira and George K. Radda. Their work appears in journals such as Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, NMR in Biomedicine, Annals of Neurology, The Lancet and Journal of Magnetic Resonance Series B.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact