Peter Stott

455 citations
23 papers · 339 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

Peter Stott

20 papers receiving 296 citations

Peers

Peter Stott
Comparison fields: 5 of 87
  • Drug Discovery 2
  • Pharmacology 97
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology 19
  • Toxicology 17
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 44
Replace J. S. Madden with:
J. S. Madden United Kingdom
Lekhansh Shukla India
Samira Djezzar France
Ingrid Amalia Havnes Norway
Matthew D. Zuckerman United States
Ingrid Castberg Norway
Wen‐Ing Tsay Taiwan
Laura Díaz United States
Nataliia Petrova Russia
Michael D. Campbell United States
Peter Stott relative to J. S. Madden United Kingdom J. S. Madden's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5×10×15×18×
J. S. Madden · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Peter Stott

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Stott's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Stott with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Stott more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Stott

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Stott. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Stott. The network helps show where Peter Stott may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 6 scholars most cited alongside Peter Stott, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Peter Stott Line = papers co-authored together Peter Stott links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 23 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200283
2 200456
3 200448
4 200424
5 201822
6 199316
7 199015
8
The outcome of menorrhagia: a retrospective case control study.
198314
9 200414
10 200411
11 200410
12 20187
13 19823
14 20042
15
Learning general practice--the experience of one trainee.
19792
16
Historic and Archaeological Resources of the Boston Area: a Framework for Preservation Decisions
19822
17 20042
18 20042
19 20052
20 20072

About Peter Stott

Peter Stott is a scholar working on Pharmacology, Gender Studies, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, General Health Professions and Psychiatry and Mental health, having authored 23 papers that have together received 339 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Peripheral Artery Disease Management (2 papers), Sport and Mega-Event Impacts (2 papers), Sports, Gender, and Society (2 papers), Treatment of Major Depression (2 papers), Animal Genetics and Reproduction (1 paper), Torture, Ethics, and Law (1 paper), Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins (1 paper) and Chronic Disease Management Strategies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Drug Discovery (2 citations), Pharmacology (97 citations), Geriatrics and Gerontology (19 citations), Toxicology (17 citations) and Psychiatry and Mental health (44 citations). Peter Stott has collaborated with scholars based in Qatar, United Kingdom and Australia. Frequent co-authors include John P.H. Wilding, John I Broom, Rory Magrath, C. A. L. Moon, James W. Bradley and Sarah L. Zimmerman. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal of Clinical Practice, Current Medical Research and Opinion, European Neuropsychopharmacology, International Journal of Sport Policy and Politics and PubMed.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact