Peter Squire

12 papers receiving 339 citations

Peers

Peter Squire
Comparison fields: 5 of 50
  • Social Psychology 183
  • Automotive Engineering 56
  • Human-Computer Interaction 31
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 63
  • Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 26
Replace Sean R. Seaman with:
Sean R. Seaman United States
Christopher G. Burns United Kingdom
Yke Bauke Eisma Netherlands
Jami Pekkanen Finland
Jork Stapel Netherlands
Sandra Mouta Portugal
Ben Mulder Netherlands
Matthias Rötting Germany
Birgitta Thorslund Sweden
Laura Millen United Kingdom
Peter Squire relative to Sean R. Seaman United States Sean R. Seaman's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Sean R. Seaman · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Peter Squire

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Squire's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Squire with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Squire more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Squire

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Squire. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Squire. The network helps show where Peter Squire may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Peter Squire, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Peter Squire Line = papers co-authored together Peter Squire links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

15 of 15 papers shown
#Work
1 2005115
2 201971
3 200753
4 201047
5 200640
6
Anticipating Widespread Augmented Reality: Insights from the 2018 AR Visioning Workshop
201918
7 20107
8 20167
9 20134
10 20204
11
Overcoming obstacles to undergraduate research at a small institution
20033
12 20041
13
Quick-Eye: Examination of Human Performance Characteristics Using Eye Tracking and Manual-Based Control Systems for Monitoring Multiple Displays
20131
14 20130
15 20150

About Peter Squire

Peter Squire is a scholar working on Social Psychology, Human-Computer Interaction, Automotive Engineering, Family Practice and Behavioral Neuroscience, having authored 15 papers that have together received 371 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Human-Automation Interaction and Safety (6 papers), Gaze Tracking and Assistive Technology (2 papers), Spatial Cognition and Navigation (2 papers), Visual Attention and Saliency Detection (1 paper), Air Traffic Management and Optimization (1 paper), Engineering Education and Pedagogy (1 paper), Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics (1 paper) and Cognitive Abilities and Testing (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Social Psychology (183 citations), Automotive Engineering (56 citations), Human-Computer Interaction (31 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (63 citations) and Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (26 citations). Peter Squire has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Japan. Frequent co-authors include Raja Parasuraman, Scott M. Galster, Ericka M. Rovira, Ascher K. Munion, Jeanine K. Stefanucci, Michael Hendricks, J. Gregory Trafton, Reshma Kumar, Shimin Fu and Marla Zinni. Their work appears in journals such as Neuropsychology, Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, IEEE Transactions on Systems Man and Cybernetics - Part A Systems and Humans, Ergonomics and NeuroImage.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact