Peter Smittenaar

3.0k citations
26 papers · 1.8k · h-index 20

Impact in

Papers in

Peter Smittenaar

26 papers receiving 1.8k citations

Peers

Peter Smittenaar
Comparison fields: 5 of 156
  • General Decision Sciences 128
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 893
  • Applied Psychology 136
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 314
  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 19
Replace Emma Williams with:
Emma Williams United Kingdom
Stephanie M. Greer United States
Eliza Congdon United States
Britt Anderson United States
Xiaochu Zhang China
Esther Fujiwara Canada
Tingyong Feng China
Chiara Crespi Italy
Nathaniel E. Anderson United States
Kirsten Labudda Germany
Peter Smittenaar relative to Emma Williams United Kingdom Emma Williams's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.1×
Emma Williams · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Peter Smittenaar

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Smittenaar's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Smittenaar with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Smittenaar more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Smittenaar

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Smittenaar. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Smittenaar. The network helps show where Peter Smittenaar may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Peter Smittenaar, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Peter Smittenaar Line = papers co-authored together Peter Smittenaar links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 26 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2018230
2 2014224
3 2012195
4 2013176
5 2017115
6 2016112
7 201580
8 201674
9 201472
10 201865
11 201364
12 201259
13 202156
14 201453
15 201552
16 202035
17 202030
18 201724
19 201424
20 202320

About Peter Smittenaar

Peter Smittenaar is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Applied Psychology, Surgery and Pharmacology, having authored 26 papers that have together received 1.8k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (10 papers), Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (4 papers), Behavioral Health and Interventions (3 papers), Mental Health Research Topics (3 papers), Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (3 papers), Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics (2 papers), Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications (2 papers) and Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Decision Sciences (128 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (893 citations), Applied Psychology (136 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (314 citations) and Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (19 citations). Peter Smittenaar has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Raymond J. Dolan, Klaus Wunderlich, Thomas H. B. FitzGerald, Daniel A Perez, Peter Zeidman, Robb B. Rutledge, Peter Dayan, Harriet R. Brown, Rick A. Adams and Jeannie F. Bailey. Their work appears in journals such as PLoS ONE, British Journal of Cancer, NeuroImage, Journal of Medical Internet Research and Neuron.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact