Tina Smith

36 papers receiving 716 citations

Peers

Tina Smith
Comparison fields: 5 of 93
  • Clinical Psychology 272
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine 95
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 101
  • Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation 33
  • Occupational Therapy 27
Replace Aristides M. Machado‐Rodrigues with:
Aristides M. Machado‐Rodrigues Portugal
Dan Jones United Kingdom
Kim Geok Soh Malaysia
Hermundur Sigmundsson Norway
Lena Victoria Nordheim Norway
Georgian Bădicu Romania
Eilin Ekeland Norway
Eric E. Wickel United States
Lauve Metcalfe United States
Julia J. Roby United States
Tina Smith relative to Aristides M. Machado‐Rodrigues Portugal Aristides M. Machado‐Rodrigues's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.9×
Aristides M. Machado‐Rodrigues · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Tina Smith

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Tina Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Tina Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Tina Smith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Tina Smith

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Tina Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Tina Smith. The network helps show where Tina Smith may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Tina Smith, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Tina Smith Line = papers co-authored together Tina Smith links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 41 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1992125
2 200693
3 199366
4 201845
5 201944
6 201639
7 199429
8 199529
9 199229
10 201428
11 201927
12 199524
13 202123
14 199522
15 199321
16 202019
17 199417
18 201515
19 198115
20 202014

About Tina Smith

Tina Smith is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Orthopedics and Sports Medicine and Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, having authored 41 papers that have together received 785 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Family and Disability Support Research (7 papers), Sports Performance and Training (6 papers), Sports injuries and prevention (5 papers), Infant Development and Preterm Care (4 papers), Diversity and Impact of Dance (4 papers), Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet (3 papers), Parental Involvement in Education (3 papers) and Lower Extremity Biomechanics and Pathologies (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (272 citations), Orthopedics and Sports Medicine (95 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (101 citations), Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation (33 citations) and Occupational Therapy (27 citations). Tina Smith has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Virginia Buysse, Donald B. Bailey, Wendy Gilleard, Rune J. Simeonsson, Massimiliano Ditroilo, Catherine A. Dobson, Grant Abt, C. J. Edmonds, Alan Nevill and Matthew Wyon. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal of Sports Science & Coaching, Gait & Posture, Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology, Physiology & Behavior and PLoS ONE.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact