Peter Schmid

40 papers receiving 1.6k citations

Peers

Peter Schmid
Comparison fields: 5 of 98
  • Developmental Neuroscience 108
  • Rehabilitation 78
  • Molecular Biology 812
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 195
  • Neurology 72
Replace Jens van den Brandt with:
Jens van den Brandt Germany
Alpa Trivedi United States
Dajiang Qin China
Gregory L. Bennett United States
Raj Murali United States
Martina Kirstein Spain
Danika Khong United States
Alice Laroni Italy
Fabrizio G. Mastronardi Canada
Adamo Diamantini Italy
Peter Schmid relative to Jens van den Brandt Germany Jens van den Brandt's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Jens van den Brandt · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Peter Schmid

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Schmid's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Schmid with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Schmid more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Schmid

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Schmid. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Schmid. The network helps show where Peter Schmid may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Peter Schmid, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Peter Schmid Line = papers co-authored together Peter Schmid links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 41 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1991263
2 1991211
3 1993124
4 1989118
5 1993109
6 2006101
7 199195
8 201592
9 201260
10 200750
11 201239
12 201430
13 200829
14 199126
15 201224
16 199024
17 201723
18 201421
19 201220
20 201320

About Peter Schmid

Peter Schmid is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Epidemiology, Physiology, Neurology and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, having authored 41 papers that have together received 1.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation (3 papers), Mycobacterium research and diagnosis (3 papers), Alzheimer's disease research and treatments (3 papers), Wound Healing and Treatments (3 papers), Nitric Oxide and Endothelin Effects (2 papers), Nuclear Receptors and Signaling (2 papers), TGF-β signaling in diseases (2 papers) and Infectious Diseases and Mycology (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Developmental Neuroscience (108 citations), Rehabilitation (78 citations), Molecular Biology (812 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (195 citations) and Neurology (72 citations). Peter Schmid has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Switzerland and Australia. Frequent co-authors include H. Hameister, Graeme Bilbe, Gary McMaster, Wolfgang A. Schulz, David Cox, Rainer Maier, Mathias Montenarh, Andreas Lorenz, Herman van der Putten and Florence Botteri. Their work appears in journals such as PLoS ONE, Development, Cardiovascular Diabetology, Cell Transplantation and PLoS neglected tropical diseases.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact