Peter Schmid

42 papers receiving 1.7k citations

Peers

Peter Schmid
Comparison fields: 5 of 100
  • Developmental Neuroscience 117
  • Rehabilitation 82
  • Molecular Biology 848
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 211
  • Neurology 135
Replace Jens van den Brandt with:
Jens van den Brandt Germany
Peter Schratzberger Austria
Alpa Trivedi United States
Gregory L. Bennett United States
Dajiang Qin China
Raj Murali United States
Alice Laroni Italy
Martina Kirstein Spain
Fabrizio G. Mastronardi Canada
Adamo Diamantini Italy
Peter Schmid relative to Jens van den Brandt Germany Jens van den Brandt's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.1×
Jens van den Brandt · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Peter Schmid

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Schmid's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Schmid with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Schmid more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Schmid

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Schmid. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Schmid. The network helps show where Peter Schmid may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Peter Schmid, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Peter Schmid Line = papers co-authored together Peter Schmid links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 42 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1991276
2 1991221
3 1993129
4 1989120
5 1993114
6 2006108
7 199198
8 201595
9 201265
10 200759
11 201239
12 201430
13 201729
14 200829
15 199128
16 201225
17 199024
18 201422
19 201321
20 201220

About Peter Schmid

Peter Schmid is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Epidemiology, Physiology, Neurology and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, having authored 42 papers that have together received 1.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation (3 papers), Mycobacterium research and diagnosis (3 papers), Alzheimer's disease research and treatments (3 papers), Wound Healing and Treatments (3 papers), Nitric Oxide and Endothelin Effects (2 papers), Nuclear Receptors and Signaling (2 papers), TGF-β signaling in diseases (2 papers) and Infectious Diseases and Mycology (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Developmental Neuroscience (117 citations), Rehabilitation (82 citations), Molecular Biology (848 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (211 citations) and Neurology (135 citations). Peter Schmid has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Switzerland and Australia. Frequent co-authors include H. Hameister, Gary McMaster, Graeme Bilbe, Wolfgang A. Schulz, David Cox, Rainer Maier, Andreas Lorenz, Mathias Montenarh, Florence Botteri and Herman van der Putten. Their work appears in journals such as PLoS ONE, Cardiovascular Diabetology, Development, Cell Transplantation and PLoS neglected tropical diseases.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact