PLoS neglected tropical diseases

356.0k citations
11.6k papers · · active since 1950

Impact in

Papers in

    • Parasites and Host Interactions 1.8k
    • Viral Infections and Vectors 1.2k
    • Parasitic Diseases Research and Treatment 726

PLoS neglected tropical diseases

10.4k papers receiving 331.3k citations

Peers

PLoS neglected tropical diseases
Comparison fields: 5 of 237
  • Parasitology 87.7k
  • Infectious Diseases 100.2k
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 136.1k
  • Virology 16.2k
  • Small Animals 20.1k
Replace Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene with:
Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene United Kingdom
American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene United States
Emerging infectious diseases United States
Bioinformatics United States
Nucleic Acids Research United States
PLoS Pathogens United States
Molecular Biology and Evolution United States
The Journal of Experimental Medicine United States
The Lancet Infectious Diseases United States
The Journal of Immunology United States
PLoS neglected tropical diseases relative to Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene United Kingdom Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×6.4×
Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene · 1×
Citations per year

Countries where authors publish in PLoS neglected tropical diseases

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in PLoS neglected tropical diseases. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in PLoS neglected tropical diseases with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites PLoS neglected tropical diseases more than expected).

Fields of papers published in PLoS neglected tropical diseases

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in PLoS neglected tropical diseases. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in PLoS neglected tropical diseases.

About PLoS neglected tropical diseases

The 11.6k papers published in PLoS neglected tropical diseases in the last decades have received a total of 356.0k indexed citations . Papers published in PLoS neglected tropical diseases usually cover Parasitology (2.8k papers), Infectious Diseases (3.0k papers), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (3.8k papers), Microbiology (82 papers) and Virology (451 papers) specifically the topics of Mosquito-borne diseases and control (2.0k papers), Parasites and Host Interactions (1.8k papers), Trypanosoma species research and implications (1.3k papers), Research on Leishmaniasis Studies (1.3k papers), Viral Infections and Vectors (1.2k papers), Parasitic Diseases Research and Treatment (726 papers), Malaria Research and Control (680 papers) and Parasite Biology and Host Interactions (494 papers). The most active scholars publishing in PLoS neglected tropical diseases are Peter J. Hotez, Thomas W. Scott, Jürg Utzinger, Charles H. King, Aruna M. Kamath, Marleen Boelaert, Paul R. Torgerson, Lee Ching Ng, Wendy W. J. van de Sande and Bart J. Currie.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact