Peter Robinson

689 citations
32 papers · 332 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

Peter Robinson

28 papers receiving 266 citations

Peers

Peter Robinson
Comparison fields: 5 of 76
  • Literature and Literary Theory 143
  • Classics 30
  • Cultural Studies 62
  • Conservation 22
  • Theoretical Computer Science 4
Replace Mike Kestemont with:
Mike Kestemont Belgium
Fotis Jannidis Germany
Peter L. Shillingsburg United States
David L. Hoover United States
J. F. Burrows Australia
Dirk Van Hülle Belgium
Michael Witmore United States
Katherine Bode Australia
William Sayers United States
David Greetham United States
Peter Robinson relative to Mike Kestemont Belgium Mike Kestemont's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.1×
Mike Kestemont · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Peter Robinson

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Robinson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Robinson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Robinson more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Robinson

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Robinson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Robinson. The network helps show where Peter Robinson may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 17 scholars most cited alongside Peter Robinson, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Peter Robinson Line = papers co-authored together Peter Robinson links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 32 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 199893
2
Cladistic analysis of an Old Norse manuscript tradition
199630
3 200523
4
Appendix E: MUC-7 Named Entity Task Definition (version 3.5)
199821
5 199218
6
Computer-Assisted Methods of Stemmatic Analysis
199317
7 200617
8 200814
9
A Stemmatic Analysis of the Fifteenth-Century Witnesses to The Wife of Bath’s Prologue
199713
10 200311
11 201610
12 20039
13 20007
14 20146
15 20105
16 19994
17 20164
18 20213
19 20013
20 19983

About Peter Robinson

Peter Robinson is a scholar working on Literature and Literary Theory, Classics, Artificial Intelligence, Molecular Biology and Language and Linguistics, having authored 32 papers that have together received 332 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Digital Humanities and Scholarship (15 papers), Medieval Literature and History (7 papers), Folklore, Mythology, and Literature Studies (6 papers), Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies (4 papers), Natural Language Processing Techniques (3 papers), Linguistics and language evolution (3 papers), Language and cultural evolution (2 papers) and Libraries, Manuscripts, and Books (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Literature and Literary Theory (143 citations), Classics (30 citations), Cultural Studies (62 citations), Conservation (22 citations) and Theoretical Computer Science (4 citations). Peter Robinson has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Canada and United States. Frequent co-authors include Robert J. O’Hara, Christopher J. Howe, Adrian C. Barbrook, N. F. Blake, Nancy Chinchor, Peter Shaw, Matthew Spencer, Linne R. Mooney, E. Wattel and R. Alan North. Their work appears in journals such as Digital Scholarship in the Humanities, Literature Compass, Nature, The Chaucer Review and Biometrics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact