Digital Scholarship in the Humanities

720 papers and 3.0k indexed citations i.

About

The 720 papers published in Digital Scholarship in the Humanities in the last decades have received a total of 3.0k indexed citations. Papers published in Digital Scholarship in the Humanities usually cover Artificial Intelligence (375 papers), Literature and Literary Theory (185 papers) and Sociology and Political Science (94 papers) specifically the topics of Natural Language Processing Techniques (218 papers), Authorship Attribution and Profiling (158 papers) and Digital Humanities and Scholarship (144 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Digital Scholarship in the Humanities are Maciej Eder, Jacques Savoy, Melissa Terras, Alexander Koplenig, Patrick Juola, Johanna Drucker, Gi‐Zen Liu, Jan Rybicki, Noam Ordan and Shuly Wintner.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Digital Scholarship in the Humanities

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Digital Scholarship in the Humanities. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Digital Scholarship in the Humanities.

Countries where authors publish in Digital Scholarship in the Humanities

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Digital Scholarship in the Humanities. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Digital Scholarship in the Humanities with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Digital Scholarship in the Humanities more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025