Peter Rieß

899 citations
22 papers · 661 · h-index 12

Impact in

Papers in

Peter Rieß

19 papers receiving 642 citations

Peers

Peter Rieß
Comparison fields: 5 of 62
  • Developmental Neuroscience 225
  • Genetics 158
  • Neurology 158
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine 71
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 106
Replace William Puckett with:
William Puckett United States
Celia Bonilla Spain
Tim Klopfer Germany
Robert A. Hetz United States
Travis Dailey United States
Zhongju Shi China
Concepción Aguayo Spain
John B. Kurek Australia
Karyn A. Ledbetter United States
Jun Namiki Japan
Peter Rieß relative to William Puckett United States William Puckett's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.7×
William Puckett · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Peter Rieß

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Rieß's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Rieß with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Rieß more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Rieß

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Rieß. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Rieß. The network helps show where Peter Rieß may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Peter Rieß, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Peter Rieß Line = papers co-authored together Peter Rieß links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 22 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2002187
2 200689
3 200780
4 200771
5 200252
6 200544
7 200144
8 201021
9 200819
10 200718
11 201314
12 200911
13 20143
14
Die Strafprozessordnung und das Gerichtsverfassungsgesetz : Grosskommentar
19842
15 20061
16 19751
17 19931
18 19691
19 19851
20 20051

About Peter Rieß

Peter Rieß is a scholar working on Developmental Neuroscience, Political Science and International Relations, Sociology and Political Science, Law and Molecular Biology, having authored 22 papers that have together received 661 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Criminal Law and Policy (6 papers), Anesthesia and Neurotoxicity Research (6 papers), Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms (5 papers), European Criminal Justice and Data Protection (5 papers), Criminal Law and Evidence (5 papers), Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances (4 papers), Mesenchymal stem cell research (4 papers) and Pluripotent Stem Cells Research (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Developmental Neuroscience (225 citations), Genetics (158 citations), Neurology (158 citations), Orthopedics and Sports Medicine (71 citations) and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (106 citations). Peter Rieß has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United States and Austria. Frequent co-authors include Edmund Neugebauer, Tracy K. McIntosh, Marc Maegele, Ramesh Raghupathi, Kathryn E. Saatman, Luca Longhi, Philipp M. Lenzlinger, Helmut Laurer, Marek Molčányi and Bertil Bouillon. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Neurotrauma, Neurosurgery, Cellular Physiology and Biochemistry, Shock and Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact