Peter Osmark

21 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Peers

Peter Osmark
Comparison fields: 5 of 93
  • Immunology and Allergy 242
  • Biochemistry 72
  • Dermatology 68
  • Molecular Biology 461
  • Cell Biology 98
Replace Rika Nakamura with:
Rika Nakamura Japan
Thomas E. Rollins United States
Andreas Nandy Germany
Theodore R. Sana United States
Rachel A. Rowlinson United Kingdom
Kris Pauwels Belgium
Bernd Gesslbauer Austria
Rangaiah Shashidharamurthy United States
Miljan Simonović United States
Roger A. Peeters Netherlands
Peter Osmark relative to Rika Nakamura Japan Rika Nakamura's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6×8×9×
Rika Nakamura · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Peter Osmark

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Osmark's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Osmark with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Osmark more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Osmark

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Osmark. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Osmark. The network helps show where Peter Osmark may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Peter Osmark, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Peter Osmark Line = papers co-authored together Peter Osmark links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 22 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1996338
2 1999127
3 2000114
4 199874
5 200961
6 201852
7 201051
8 200849
9 201142
10 200638
11 200634
12 200727
13 201121
14 200820
15 199312
16 202010
17 19969
18 20167
19 20095
20 19961

About Peter Osmark

Peter Osmark is a scholar working on Immunology and Allergy, Biochemistry, Cell Biology, Molecular Biology and Food Science, having authored 22 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Lipid metabolism and biosynthesis (3 papers), Proteins in Food Systems (3 papers), Pancreatic function and diabetes (3 papers), Food Allergy and Anaphylaxis Research (3 papers), Hemoglobin structure and function (2 papers), Protein Structure and Dynamics (2 papers), Enzyme Structure and Function (2 papers) and Epigenetics and DNA Methylation (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Immunology and Allergy (242 citations), Biochemistry (72 citations), Dermatology (68 citations), Molecular Biology (461 citations) and Cell Biology (98 citations). Peter Osmark has collaborated with scholars based in Sweden, Denmark and United States. Frequent co-authors include Flemming M. Poulsen, Jørgen Nedergaard Larsen, Henning Løwenstein, Henrik Ipsen, Michael Dho Spangfort, Michael Gajhede, R. J. Joost van Neerven, Carsten Schou, Annika Lindqvist and Erik Renström. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, Protein Expression and Purification, PLoS ONE, Plant Molecular Biology and Journal of Magnetic Resonance Series B.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact