Peter Opie

1.9k citations
26 papers · 1.3k · h-index 12

Impact in

Papers in

Peter Opie

22 papers receiving 779 citations

Peers

Peter Opie
Comparison fields: 5 of 106
  • Literature and Literary Theory 381
  • Music 70
  • Linguistics and Language 71
  • Gender Studies 130
  • Language and Linguistics 130
Replace Iona Opie with:
Iona Opie
Carolyn L. Burke United States
Vivian Gussin Paley United States
Joanne Tompkins Canada
Jeffrey M. R. Duncan‐Andrade United States
John Morreall United States
Eileen Honan Australia
Anne Nesbet United States
A. McHoul Australia
Elliott Oring United States
Peter Opie relative to Iona Opie Iona Opie's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Iona Opie · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Peter Opie

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Opie's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Opie with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Opie more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Opie

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Opie. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Opie. The network helps show where Peter Opie may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 6 scholars most cited alongside Peter Opie, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Peter Opie Line = papers co-authored together Peter Opie links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 26 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1971291
2 1960243
3 1952143
4
The classic fairy tales
1980132
5 1961106
6
The singing game
198579
7 196072
8 196072
9
Children's games in street and playground : chasing, catching, seeking, hunting, racing, duelling, exerting, daring, guessing, acting, pretending
198431
10 197229
11
The Oxford Nursery Rhyme Book
195517
12
The Oxford book of children's verse
197311
13 19649
14 20177
15
Children's Games with Things: Marbles, Fivestones, Throwing and Catching, Gambling, Hopscotch, Chucking and Pitching, Ball-Bouncing, Skipping, Tops and Tipcat
19976
16
The Puffin Book of Nursery Rhymes
19975
17
The Oxford book of narrative verse
19834
18
A nursery companion
19803
19 19633
20 19702

About Peter Opie

Peter Opie is a scholar working on Literature and Literary Theory, Philosophy, Sociology and Political Science, Language and Linguistics and Infectious Diseases, having authored 26 papers that have together received 1.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Folklore, Mythology, and Literature Studies (5 papers), Themes in Literature Analysis (4 papers), Religious Studies and Spiritual Practices (2 papers), Lexicography and Language Studies (1 paper) and Digital Games and Media (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Literature and Literary Theory (381 citations), Music (70 citations), Linguistics and Language (71 citations), Gender Studies (130 citations) and Language and Linguistics (130 citations). Peter Opie has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Iona Opie, Beatrice B. Whiting, Basil Bernstein, Sheldon L. Messinger, Charles Madge and Maurice Sendak. Their work appears in journals such as Folklore, Journal of American Folklore, Western Folklore, PEDIATRICS and British Journal of Sociology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact