Peter Nolan

3.3k citations
108 papers · 2k · h-index 24

Impact in

Papers in

Peter Nolan

97 papers receiving 1.6k citations

Peers

Peter Nolan
Comparison fields: 5 of 94
  • Strategy and Management 546
  • Political Science and International Relations 880
  • General Energy 25
  • Fuel Technology 17
  • Development 42
Replace Michael J. Trebilcock with:
Michael J. Trebilcock Canada
Stephen Bell Australia
Judith Clifton Spain
Ethan Barnaby Kapstein United States
Yasheng Huang United States
Mark Thatcher United Kingdom
Daniel Díaz‐Fuentes Spain
Thomas G. Rawski United States
Ernesto Dal Bó United States
Brian Levy United States
Peter Nolan relative to Michael J. Trebilcock Canada Michael J. Trebilcock's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2×2.5×
Michael J. Trebilcock · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Peter Nolan

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Nolan's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Nolan with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Nolan more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Nolan

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Nolan. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Nolan. The network helps show where Peter Nolan may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 20 scholars most cited alongside Peter Nolan, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Peter Nolan Line = papers co-authored together Peter Nolan links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 108 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2001165
2 1999125
3 2001119
4 2001110
5 200598
6 200091
7 201287
8 199581
9 200470
10 200268
11
Transforming China: Globalization, Transition and Development
200457
12 199646
13 198442
14
Market forces in China: competition and small business: the Wenzhou debate.
199042
15 201439
16 201737
17 198336
18 199629
19 198828
20 199127

About Peter Nolan

Peter Nolan is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, Economics and Econometrics, Strategy and Management, Sociology and Political Science and Finance, having authored 108 papers that have together received 2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include China's Socioeconomic Reforms and Governance (56 papers), International Business and FDI (15 papers), Asian Industrial and Economic Development (11 papers), Globalization, Economics, and Policies (11 papers), Political Economy and Marxism (9 papers), Post-Communist Economic and Political Transition (5 papers), Global Financial Crisis and Policies (4 papers) and Income, Poverty, and Inequality (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Strategy and Management (546 citations), Political Science and International Relations (880 citations), General Energy (25 citations), Fuel Technology (17 citations) and Development (42 citations). Peter Nolan has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and South Africa. Frequent co-authors include Jin Zhang, William Brown, Gordon White, Huaichuan Rui, Alan Shipman, Mike Wright, Ha‐Joon Chang, Trevor Buck, Igor V. Filatotchev and Christoph R. Weiss. Their work appears in journals such as Cambridge Journal of Economics, The Journal of Peasant Studies, Journal of Chinese Economic and Business Studies, World Development and European Management Journal.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact