Peter Ng

786 citations
17 papers · 633 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

Peter Ng

17 papers receiving 613 citations

Peers

Peter Ng
Comparison fields: 5 of 59
  • Cancer Research 291
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 129
  • Surgery 240
  • Oncology 67
  • Materials Chemistry 93
Replace Deanna L. Lane with:
Deanna L. Lane United States
Tara L. Huston United States
Hidemi Furusawa Japan
Andrzej Kurylcio Poland
Saravanan Krishnamoorthy United States
Qinghua Zhong China
Alejandro Martín Sánchez Italy
Junfeng Liu China
Maria Stanczak United States
Ralf Steinert Germany
Peter Ng relative to Deanna L. Lane United States Deanna L. Lane's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.8×
Deanna L. Lane · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Peter Ng

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Ng's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Ng with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Ng more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Ng

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Ng. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Ng. The network helps show where Peter Ng may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Peter Ng, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Peter Ng Line = papers co-authored together Peter Ng links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

17 of 17 papers shown
#Work
1 2001318
2 201397
3 200247
4 199934
5 201932
6 200023
7 200021
8 199915
9 201814
10 201913
11 20156
12 20196
13 20232
14 20122
15
Laparoscopic retroperitoneal/mesenteric lymph node sampling: a safe and effective technique.
20111
16 20161
17 20181

About Peter Ng

Peter Ng is a scholar working on Surgery, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Cancer Research, Molecular Biology and Pathology and Forensic Medicine, having authored 17 papers that have together received 633 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Bariatric Surgery and Outcomes (7 papers), Chalcogenide Semiconductor Thin Films (1 paper), Angiogenesis and VEGF in Cancer (1 paper), Surgical Simulation and Training (1 paper), Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes (1 paper), Pneumothorax, Barotrauma, Emphysema (1 paper), Injury Epidemiology and Prevention (1 paper) and Gallbladder and Bile Duct Disorders (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Cancer Research (291 citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (129 citations), Surgery (240 citations), Oncology (67 citations) and Materials Chemistry (93 citations). Peter Ng has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Melvin Swanson, Donald R. Lannin, Lorraine Tafra, Kathryn M. Verbanac, Bradford E. Halliday, Roger R Perry, Caitlin Henry, Robert F. Williams, W. Randolph Chitwood and Xiangyang Liu. Their work appears in journals such as Surgery for Obesity and Related Diseases, Obesity Surgery, The Annals of Thoracic Surgery, ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces and Annals of Surgery.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact