Peter Ng
Impact in
- Cancer Research top 5%
- Breast Cancer Treatment Studies
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine top 10%
- Breast Lesions and Carcinomas
Papers in
- Surgery 10
- Bariatric Surgery and Outcomes 7
- Surgical Simulation and Training 1
-
- Pneumothorax, Barotrauma, Emphysema 1
- Gallbladder and Bile Duct Disorders 1
- Co-authors
- Melvin Swanson (3 shared papers)Donald R. Lannin (2 shared papers)Lorraine Tafra (2 shared papers)Caitlin Henry (1 shared paper)Robert F. Williams (1 shared paper)Kathryn M. Verbanac (1 shared paper)Roger R Perry (1 shared paper)Bradford E. Halliday (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Surgery for Obesity and Related Diseases (5 papers)Obesity Surgery (2 papers)The Annals of Thoracic Surgery (2 papers)Annals of Surgery (1 paper)Annals of Surgical Oncology (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomCanada
In The Last Decade
Peter Ng
17 papers receiving 598 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 58
- Cancer Research 282
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine 120
- Surgery 225
- Oncology 62
- Materials Chemistry 93
Countries citing papers authored by Peter Ng
This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Ng's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Ng with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Ng more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Ng
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Ng. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Ng. The network helps show where Peter Ng may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Peter Ng, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2001 | 308 | |
| 2 | 2013 | 97 | |
| 3 | 2002 | 41 | |
| 4 | 2019 | 31 | |
| 5 | 1999 | 31 | |
| 6 | 2000 | 23 | |
| 7 | 2000 | 21 | |
| 8 | 1999 | 15 | |
| 9 | 2018 | 14 | |
| 10 | 2019 | 13 | |
| 11 | 2015 | 6 | |
| 12 | 2019 | 5 | |
| 13 | 2023 | 2 | |
| 14 | Laparoscopic retroperitoneal/mesenteric lymph node sampling: a safe and effective technique. | 2011 | 1 |
| 15 | 2016 | 1 | |
| 16 | 2018 | 1 | |
| 17 | 2012 | 1 |
About Peter Ng
Peter Ng is a scholar working on Surgery, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Cancer Research, Molecular Biology and Pathology and Forensic Medicine, having authored 17 papers that have together received 611 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Bariatric Surgery and Outcomes (7 papers), Chalcogenide Semiconductor Thin Films (1 paper), Angiogenesis and VEGF in Cancer (1 paper), Surgical Simulation and Training (1 paper), Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes (1 paper), Pneumothorax, Barotrauma, Emphysema (1 paper), Injury Epidemiology and Prevention (1 paper) and Gallbladder and Bile Duct Disorders (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Cancer Research (282 citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (120 citations), Surgery (225 citations), Oncology (62 citations) and Materials Chemistry (93 citations). Peter Ng has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Melvin Swanson, Donald R. Lannin, Lorraine Tafra, Caitlin Henry, Robert F. Williams, Kathryn M. Verbanac, Roger R Perry, Bradford E. Halliday, W. Randolph Chitwood and David Kingston. Their work appears in journals such as Surgery for Obesity and Related Diseases, Obesity Surgery, The Annals of Thoracic Surgery, Annals of Surgery and Annals of Surgical Oncology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.